<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dual ISP Failover with site to site VPNs in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/592330#M117902</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you want one tunnel one each ISP? This should be possible as long as the public IP's you are using on the PA are different. I recall Cisco having troubles when you try to connect two Tunnels to the same device on the other side but could be remembering this incorrectly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-17T18:58:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dual ISP Failover with site to site VPNs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/440457#M99902</link>
      <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;FONT color="#333333"&gt;Hey everyone,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;FONT color="#333333"&gt;Just started with Palo and was researching the optimal way of configuring ISP failover to include automatic failover of site to site tunnels.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;FONT color="#333333"&gt;Is there a reason to use PBF over static route removal?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;FONT color="#333333"&gt;Based on the reading &lt;A href="https://echat.date" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;date&lt;/A&gt; I was doing today, SRR appears less convoluted than PBF and seems the most similar to Cisco's SLA configuration which worked well for me before.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;FONT color="#333333"&gt;&lt;A href="https://omegle.ws" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;omegle&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;FONT color="#333333"&gt;Thanks&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 04:49:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/440457#M99902</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evahi21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-21T04:49:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual ISP Failover with site to site VPNs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/440604#M99923</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have done this many times. First I setup VPN connections via both ISP's. Then I create OSPF adjacencies between the two VPN endpoints. I then use metrics so that I force the traffic down the VPN tunnel I choose as primary and secondary. So for the secondary i would choose a metric such as 5000, this makes sure the primary tunnel is the preferred one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have also used Policy based forwarding to accomplish the same thing. IT all depends on which one you are most comfortable with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 17:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/440604#M99923</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-13T17:23:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual ISP Failover with site to site VPNs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/440673#M99925</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/195894"&gt;@Evahi21&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have at least 1 public IP address advertised to both ISPs, I would use a loopback for a single VPN tunnel.&amp;nbsp; That design is by far the simplest, but requires a separate public subnet than the ones on the interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 23:32:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/440673#M99925</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-13T23:32:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual ISP Failover with site to site VPNs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/592229#M117889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am having similar issue, but I need more guidelines. I have two ISPs and I want each of them to be used for primary and secondary between Palo Alto and Cisco ASA. From the ASA side, I kept have issue each time I try to bring up the two tunnel at the same time. So far I can only have one tunnel up and when the primary is down, I have to delete the tunnel for it on the ASA side and have only the secondary tunnel used at a time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there are a way to configure this correctly?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please advise from your experience.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:29:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/592229#M117889</guid>
      <dc:creator>PAdekeye</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-16T20:29:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual ISP Failover with site to site VPNs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/592330#M117902</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So you want one tunnel one each ISP? This should be possible as long as the public IP's you are using on the PA are different. I recall Cisco having troubles when you try to connect two Tunnels to the same device on the other side but could be remembering this incorrectly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-isp-failover-with-site-to-site-vpns/m-p/592330#M117902</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-17T18:58:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

