<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic multiple virtual routers - routing between rfouters in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-virtual-routers-routing-between-rfouters/m-p/597091#M118769</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a network with 30 PA-440 using the native SD-WAN plugin and currently I'm using a single virtual router for all sites using SDWAN and also off to my ISP's (1 using static route, 2 using my private ASN).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am migrating to a public ASN and route but will still have the majority of my network using a private ASN.&amp;nbsp; My thoughts were that I would need to configure a separate VR with my public ASN (for Internet connectivity from my Data Centre) and use the existing VR with it's private ASN for the remainder of the SD-WAN network.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've seen discussions regarding routing between VR's using static routes, but is there a way to use a routing protocol (I would assume eBGP) to route between VR's?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 05:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reece.Boucher</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-06T05:19:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>multiple virtual routers - routing between rfouters</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-virtual-routers-routing-between-rfouters/m-p/597091#M118769</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a network with 30 PA-440 using the native SD-WAN plugin and currently I'm using a single virtual router for all sites using SDWAN and also off to my ISP's (1 using static route, 2 using my private ASN).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am migrating to a public ASN and route but will still have the majority of my network using a private ASN.&amp;nbsp; My thoughts were that I would need to configure a separate VR with my public ASN (for Internet connectivity from my Data Centre) and use the existing VR with it's private ASN for the remainder of the SD-WAN network.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I've seen discussions regarding routing between VR's using static routes, but is there a way to use a routing protocol (I would assume eBGP) to route between VR's?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 05:19:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-virtual-routers-routing-between-rfouters/m-p/597091#M118769</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reece.Boucher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-06T05:19:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiple virtual routers - routing between rfouters</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-virtual-routers-routing-between-rfouters/m-p/597446#M118825</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/239781"&gt;@Reece.Boucher&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, routing between VRs using routing protocols like BGP is not currently supported, so you will need to rely on static routes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-virtual-routers-routing-between-rfouters/m-p/597446#M118825</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayGolf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-11T00:33:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

