<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SD WAN using loopback on Palo Alto in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/597910#M118924</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;wouldnt this cause a conflict? if the parent interface has an ip of 1.1.1.1/24 and the sub interface has an ip of 1.1.1.2/24 wouldnt that cause an issue?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mmercald</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-16T17:15:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SD WAN using loopback on Palo Alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/597906#M118922</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I configuring a HUB for SDWAN with vpn, however this firewall currently have vpn tunnels to 3rd parties.&amp;nbsp; Due to this I am planning on using a separate wan ip for sd-wan.&amp;nbsp; However I do not have free ports on my firewall for this.&amp;nbsp; Is it possible to configure a SDWAN HUB to use a natted loopback?&amp;nbsp; If so I am not seeing any place to configure teh sd-wan interface profile for the loopback&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:41:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/597906#M118922</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmercald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-16T15:41:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD WAN using loopback on Palo Alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/597908#M118923</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In my similar situation, I used an untagged sub-interface to terminate non-SDWAN tunnel connections.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:07:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/597908#M118923</guid>
      <dc:creator>delliott_6784</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-16T17:07:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD WAN using loopback on Palo Alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/597910#M118924</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;wouldnt this cause a conflict? if the parent interface has an ip of 1.1.1.1/24 and the sub interface has an ip of 1.1.1.2/24 wouldnt that cause an issue?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/597910#M118924</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmercald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-16T17:15:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD WAN using loopback on Palo Alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/598061#M118963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried doing this but I am getting an ARP issue, can you please go into detail regarding this setup?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/598061#M118963</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmercald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-18T00:57:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD WAN using loopback on Palo Alto</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/598863#M119109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Capability to use multiple IPs on SD-WAN participating interfaces was introduced with 11.1.0+ and plugin 3.2, so make sure you use those versions as minimum. Also, SD-WAN terminating IP will need to be first added then all additional IPs that you will have up to 4.&lt;BR /&gt;You can't terminate SD-WAN on a loopback currently, only on Physical Ethernet, AE, or Ethernet or AE subinterface.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sd-wan-using-loopback-on-palo-alto/m-p/598863#M119109</guid>
      <dc:creator>sridic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-26T14:42:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

