<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 4.0.2 vs 4.0.1 package update size in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/4-0-2-vs-4-0-1-package-update-size/m-p/16616#M12120</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should upgrade to 4.0.1 and then upgrade to the latest available version of 4.0.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Krall&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:28:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>skrall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-14T16:28:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>4.0.2 vs 4.0.1 package update size</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/4-0-2-vs-4-0-1-package-update-size/m-p/16615#M12119</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I noticed a good size difference in package size from .1 (276MB) to .2 (141MB).&amp;nbsp; When updating from 3.x - is it recommended to start with 4.0.1 and then go to 4.0.2? Or going right to .2 is acceptable? Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/4-0-2-vs-4-0-1-package-update-size/m-p/16615#M12119</guid>
      <dc:creator>MGoodnow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-14T15:59:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4.0.2 vs 4.0.1 package update size</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/4-0-2-vs-4-0-1-package-update-size/m-p/16616#M12120</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should upgrade to 4.0.1 and then upgrade to the latest available version of 4.0.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Krall&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:28:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/4-0-2-vs-4-0-1-package-update-size/m-p/16616#M12120</guid>
      <dc:creator>skrall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-14T16:28:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4.0.2 vs 4.0.1 package update size</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/4-0-2-vs-4-0-1-package-update-size/m-p/16617#M12121</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perfect.&amp;nbsp; Glad I asked.&amp;nbsp; Thanks! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:44:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/4-0-2-vs-4-0-1-package-update-size/m-p/16617#M12121</guid>
      <dc:creator>MGoodnow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-14T16:44:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4.0.2 vs 4.0.1 package update size</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/4-0-2-vs-4-0-1-package-update-size/m-p/16618#M12122</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no need to upgrade to 4.0.1. You can directly upgrade to 4.0.2 from 3.1.x. Only thing that you have to make sure is you have 4.0.1 base image downloaded.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wasim Parkar &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/4-0-2-vs-4-0-1-package-update-size/m-p/16618#M12122</guid>
      <dc:creator>zajilioss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-27T05:09:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

