<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New Flash volnureability! (CVE-2014-4671) in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16769#M12213</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are watching the correct place to see when the update is available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/u1/19491"&gt;HULK&lt;/A&gt; mentions, your sales engineer would be the best source for advance notice. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sales engineer could also help you craft a manual work around if a vulnerability is a particularly high risk for your environment.&amp;nbsp; You do need to be careful about these custom signatures as one of the reasons PA takes some time to produce a signature is to avoid a false positive that blocks production necessary traffic.&amp;nbsp; The quick fixes based on initial information do carry a risk of blocking legitimate work on your network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to measure your exposure risk for the particular vulnerability against the potential time lost in blocking legitimate traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can review the process in the documentation on creating&amp;nbsp; a custom threat signature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-5534"&gt;Creating Custom Threat Signatures&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:47:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-10T14:47:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New Flash volnureability! (CVE-2014-4671)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16765#M12209</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to &lt;A href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-17.html" title="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-17.html"&gt;Adobe Security Bulletin&lt;/A&gt; its serious volnureability, when we can expects protection on PAN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment on &lt;A href="https://threatvault.paloaltonetworks.com/" title="https://threatvault.paloaltonetworks.com/"&gt;https://threatvault.paloaltonetworks.com/&lt;/A&gt; I can't find CVE-2014-4671&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Slawek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 07:07:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16765#M12209</guid>
      <dc:creator>_slv_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-10T07:07:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Flash volnureability! (CVE-2014-4671)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16766#M12210</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Slv,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;\When a vulnerability is identified/posted, Palo Alto Networks will do a reverse engineer for that vulnerability, to understand how the vulnerability could possibly be exploited to, and then build possible protection. It’s not &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;an&lt;/SPAN&gt; simple task to create an appropriate signature.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Hence, need to&amp;nbsp; gather the right information about the vulnerability &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;( &lt;/SPAN&gt;as much as possible) to build an IPS vulnerability signature, also Palo Alto Networks should take care about&amp;nbsp; the false positives and performance implications in creating the signature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, please wait for further updates on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 07:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16766#M12210</guid>
      <dc:creator>HULK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-10T07:20:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Flash volnureability! (CVE-2014-4671)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16767#M12211</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do You thing that we can expect emergency upgrade of therat signatures soon?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 07:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16767#M12211</guid>
      <dc:creator>_slv_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-10T07:42:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Flash volnureability! (CVE-2014-4671)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16768#M12212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;slv&lt;/SPAN&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may contact with your PA SE for most recent activity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 07:47:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16768#M12212</guid>
      <dc:creator>HULK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-10T07:47:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Flash volnureability! (CVE-2014-4671)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16769#M12213</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are watching the correct place to see when the update is available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/u1/19491"&gt;HULK&lt;/A&gt; mentions, your sales engineer would be the best source for advance notice. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sales engineer could also help you craft a manual work around if a vulnerability is a particularly high risk for your environment.&amp;nbsp; You do need to be careful about these custom signatures as one of the reasons PA takes some time to produce a signature is to avoid a false positive that blocks production necessary traffic.&amp;nbsp; The quick fixes based on initial information do carry a risk of blocking legitimate work on your network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to measure your exposure risk for the particular vulnerability against the potential time lost in blocking legitimate traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can review the process in the documentation on creating&amp;nbsp; a custom threat signature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-5534"&gt;Creating Custom Threat Signatures&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:47:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-flash-volnureability-cve-2014-4671/m-p/16769#M12213</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-10T14:47:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

