<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic OSPF Adjacency Fails Post Upgrade - needed new rule in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacency-fails-post-upgrade-needed-new-rule/m-p/996520#M122386</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;OSPF failed recently after an upgrade and required a new rule to allow the ospf application between our NGFW inside zone and our core router. We moved from version&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;10.2.7-h8 to&amp;nbsp;10.2.7-h18 . Anyone ever seen this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Nathan&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:45:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NSutfin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-04T15:45:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OSPF Adjacency Fails Post Upgrade - needed new rule</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacency-fails-post-upgrade-needed-new-rule/m-p/996520#M122386</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OSPF failed recently after an upgrade and required a new rule to allow the ospf application between our NGFW inside zone and our core router. We moved from version&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;10.2.7-h8 to&amp;nbsp;10.2.7-h18 . Anyone ever seen this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Nathan&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:45:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacency-fails-post-upgrade-needed-new-rule/m-p/996520#M122386</guid>
      <dc:creator>NSutfin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-04T15:45:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF Adjacency Fails Post Upgrade - needed new rule</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacency-fails-post-upgrade-needed-new-rule/m-p/1240914#M125437</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Nathan, &lt;BR /&gt;I haven’t seen that specific issue myself, especially with that upgrade path. It’s interesting that it suddenly required a new rule for OSPF traffic. Did it end up resolving on its own after the change, or are you still seeing the same behavior now?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 18:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-adjacency-fails-post-upgrade-needed-new-rule/m-p/1240914#M125437</guid>
      <dc:creator>Elwin3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-29T18:10:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

