<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPS Signatures in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ips-signatures/m-p/16860#M12288</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now, we don't deprecate IPS signatures as we have plenty of room for IPS signature growth. However, there will come a time when some of our signatures will need to be deprecated, but that won't happen for many more years to come. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:26:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fredallee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-15T12:26:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPS Signatures</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ips-signatures/m-p/16859#M12287</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, does anyone know if PAN retires somehow the old IPS signuters?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Into the update bulletin there are informations only for new and modified signatures, not for the retired ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example yesterday night I received the PAN bulleting and Cisco. In the PAN's email 65 new signatures were added and 14 updated. In che Cisco's 10 added/modified and 21 retired.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the special PAN hardware capable to keep all the signatures due it's special parallel multi-core configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any information will be appreciate. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ips-signatures/m-p/16859#M12287</guid>
      <dc:creator>zanonibs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-15T08:38:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS Signatures</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ips-signatures/m-p/16860#M12288</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right now, we don't deprecate IPS signatures as we have plenty of room for IPS signature growth. However, there will come a time when some of our signatures will need to be deprecated, but that won't happen for many more years to come. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:26:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ips-signatures/m-p/16860#M12288</guid>
      <dc:creator>fredallee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-15T12:26:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS Signatures</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ips-signatures/m-p/16861#M12289</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perfect! This is the information I want to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:23:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ips-signatures/m-p/16861#M12289</guid>
      <dc:creator>zanonibs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-15T14:23:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

