<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Panorama Error: Number of address group(x) exceeds platform capacity(x) in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-error-number-of-address-group-x-exceeds-platform/m-p/1085401#M122889</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We onboarded the 1 pair of Palo Alto firewalls into panorama. It is successfully onboard. New Template stack pushed successfully to firewall. But the device group was failed with “&lt;STRONG&gt;Error: Number of address group(x) exceeds platform capacity(xx)&lt;/STRONG&gt;”.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Based on Palo Alto solution is to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;disable "Share Unused Address and Service Objects with Devices" to prevent the unnecessary sharing of unused service objects on the devices &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;in panorama.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href="https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fknowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com%2FKCSArticleDetail%3Fid%3DkA10g000000Cm0DCAS&amp;amp;data=05%7C02%7Cpansupportnoc.apac%40westcon.com%7C17b0cb7fa0a147b77b8d08dd3520666a%7Cec8933c6cfb24dd9bfc9621cde1dea8f%7C0%7C0%7C638725135731951445%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C80000%7C%7C%7C&amp;amp;sdata=MFLz0FlF5X58RG6QTAllFg6Oww4XAzSIfCRkIz8eK7I%3D&amp;amp;reserved=0" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000Cm0DCAS&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since already existing&amp;nbsp; firewalls integrated with Panorama, if we disable this option what will be the impact.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 07:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fariq_Zaidi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-15T07:45:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Panorama Error: Number of address group(x) exceeds platform capacity(x)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-error-number-of-address-group-x-exceeds-platform/m-p/1085401#M122889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We onboarded the 1 pair of Palo Alto firewalls into panorama. It is successfully onboard. New Template stack pushed successfully to firewall. But the device group was failed with “&lt;STRONG&gt;Error: Number of address group(x) exceeds platform capacity(xx)&lt;/STRONG&gt;”.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Based on Palo Alto solution is to &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;disable "Share Unused Address and Service Objects with Devices" to prevent the unnecessary sharing of unused service objects on the devices &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;in panorama.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A href="https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fknowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com%2FKCSArticleDetail%3Fid%3DkA10g000000Cm0DCAS&amp;amp;data=05%7C02%7Cpansupportnoc.apac%40westcon.com%7C17b0cb7fa0a147b77b8d08dd3520666a%7Cec8933c6cfb24dd9bfc9621cde1dea8f%7C0%7C0%7C638725135731951445%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C80000%7C%7C%7C&amp;amp;sdata=MFLz0FlF5X58RG6QTAllFg6Oww4XAzSIfCRkIz8eK7I%3D&amp;amp;reserved=0" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000Cm0DCAS&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since already existing&amp;nbsp; firewalls integrated with Panorama, if we disable this option what will be the impact.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 07:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-error-number-of-address-group-x-exceeds-platform/m-p/1085401#M122889</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fariq_Zaidi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T07:45:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Panorama Error: Number of address group(x) exceeds platform capacity(x)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-error-number-of-address-group-x-exceeds-platform/m-p/1085406#M122891</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/225107"&gt;@Fariq_Zaidi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There will be no impact as only unused objects will be removed from firewalls which will reduce the number of objects on firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mohammad Talib&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-error-number-of-address-group-x-exceeds-platform/m-p/1085406#M122891</guid>
      <dc:creator>mshekh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T08:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

