<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ECMP breaks secure email access. in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1227783#M124149</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;while using ECMP for the last 2 years without any issues using 3 ISP's with different weight and enabling Symmetric Return and Strict Source Path, I found that some sites with authentication access and Proofpoint secure emails access are being timed out&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;because of their sensitivity of the source ISP change during the session.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In most of the cases creating BPF rule using address group for all those site's FQDN resolve the issue, but I'm looking for a way to using BPF based on URL category like Banks\financial sites.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone face the same issue and solved it with a different approach?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SShnap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-30T16:57:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ECMP breaks secure email access.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1227783#M124149</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;while using ECMP for the last 2 years without any issues using 3 ISP's with different weight and enabling Symmetric Return and Strict Source Path, I found that some sites with authentication access and Proofpoint secure emails access are being timed out&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;because of their sensitivity of the source ISP change during the session.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In most of the cases creating BPF rule using address group for all those site's FQDN resolve the issue, but I'm looking for a way to using BPF based on URL category like Banks\financial sites.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone face the same issue and solved it with a different approach?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1227783#M124149</guid>
      <dc:creator>SShnap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-30T16:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ECMP breaks secure email access.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1227788#M124151</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40971"&gt;@SShnap&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I had similar issues with 1 customer.&amp;nbsp; Changing the ECMP Load Balance Method from IP Modulo (default) to IP Hash caused all sessions with the same source/destination to always go out the same interface.&amp;nbsp; This eliminated the need for PBF, and the applications worked properly.&amp;nbsp; You could also check the box so that all traffic from a source IP address always goes out the same interface.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It &lt;EM&gt;appeared&lt;/EM&gt; that the problem was that the web application wanted all traffic from the same source to have the same IP.&amp;nbsp; This change fixed the issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 17:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1227788#M124151</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-30T17:51:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ECMP breaks secure email access.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1227789#M124152</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/77347"&gt;@TomYoung&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thank you for the comment, so if I'm going to IP Hash route, I need to remove the PBF and there is no weight consideration?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Currently I'm using 2 ISP with same weight and 3rd ISP for backup with lower weight.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will check this option later and see the results.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:00:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1227789#M124152</guid>
      <dc:creator>SShnap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-30T19:00:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ECMP breaks secure email access.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1227790#M124153</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40971"&gt;@SShnap&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No, there is no weight consideration with IP Hash.&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-networking-admin/ecmp/ecmp-load-balancing-algorithms" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-networking-admin/ecmp/ecmp-load-balancing-algorithms&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IP Hash balances over all links the same.&amp;nbsp; If you want the 3rd ISP for backup, you can give it a higher metric.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm sure you already know this, but it is safer to disable PBF for now rather than remove.&amp;nbsp; Rollback becomes much faster.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:07:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1227790#M124153</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-30T19:07:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ECMP breaks secure email access.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1228262#M124201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/77347"&gt;@TomYoung&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thank you for the response, I still want to use the PBF because some of the services are being allowed based on the ISP interface outbound.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you know what is prioritize first if we are using IP Hash and PBF?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I meant disable before removing them completely, thank you for the clarification.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 15:59:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1228262#M124201</guid>
      <dc:creator>SShnap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-06T15:59:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ECMP breaks secure email access.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1228268#M124202</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40971"&gt;@SShnap&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PBF takes priority over routing.&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-admin/policy/policy-based-forwarding" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/11-1/pan-os-admin/policy/policy-based-forwarding&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 16:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-breaks-secure-email-access/m-p/1228268#M124202</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-06T16:22:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

