<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PVLAN in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pvlan/m-p/1228337#M124206</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello. I've been trying to use PVLAN with palo alto. I have two isolated host which are on the same subnet and wanted them to communicate through palo alto. I was able to manage with a switch using local proxy arp but from what I've searched palo alto doesn't have that feature.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I see the arp packets from host A going to palo alto but since the destination isn't palo alto and there isn't a proxy arp feature I believe palo alto drops them even before reaching the dataplane.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Has anyone successfully managed using PVLAN with pal alto?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the help.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 06:14:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kenya5115</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-07T06:14:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PVLAN</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pvlan/m-p/1228337#M124206</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello. I've been trying to use PVLAN with palo alto. I have two isolated host which are on the same subnet and wanted them to communicate through palo alto. I was able to manage with a switch using local proxy arp but from what I've searched palo alto doesn't have that feature.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I see the arp packets from host A going to palo alto but since the destination isn't palo alto and there isn't a proxy arp feature I believe palo alto drops them even before reaching the dataplane.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Has anyone successfully managed using PVLAN with pal alto?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the help.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 06:14:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pvlan/m-p/1228337#M124206</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kenya5115</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-07T06:14:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PVLAN</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pvlan/m-p/1228443#M124217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/190799449"&gt;@Kenya5115&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This functionality wouldn't be backed into PAN-OS at all. There's ways that you can get this to function by just segmenting everything via multiple gateways assigned to the same zone and setting and overriding the intrazone-default policy behavior with a dedicated rule or just by changing that policy form allow to deny, but there's not a magic way to get this to function and without a good handle on automation such a deployment could be a major inconvenience to the rest of your infrastructure team. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 21:46:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pvlan/m-p/1228443#M124217</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-07T21:46:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PVLAN</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pvlan/m-p/1228452#M124219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/190799449"&gt;@Kenya5115&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can have the NGFW inspect traffic between L2 hosts without having to route them via proxy ARP.&amp;nbsp; You can connect them to L2 ports and add them to L2 zones.&amp;nbsp; Then the security policy can be used to control traffic between the 2 hosts.&amp;nbsp; You would create a VLAN interface to route traffic to different subnets.&amp;nbsp; You could even migrate your current L3 interface to L2, but you would need to add a 2nd L2 connection for one of your hosts (either directly or though the switch on a new VLAN).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClRq" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClRq&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-between-layer-2-zones/td-p/302930" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-between-layer-2-zones/td-p/302930&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tom&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 01:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pvlan/m-p/1228452#M124219</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomYoung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-08T01:36:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

