<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NEW CVE causes new hotfix, can the hotfix be considered stable? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-cve-causes-new-hotfix-can-the-hotfix-be-considered-stable/m-p/1230069#M124387</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15603"&gt;@Raido_Rattameister&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks for sharing this, Raido. I agree it's important to not just rely on the preferred version list but also cross-check CVEs relevant to our environment.&lt;A title="tubidy" href="https://www-tubidy.ws" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt; That link you shared is definitely helpful as a reference: &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/support-pan-os-software-release-guidance/ta-p/258304" target="_self"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/support-pan-os-software-release-guidance/ta-p/258304&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 09:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>albertojaden8</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-26T09:53:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NEW CVE causes new hotfix, can the hotfix be considered stable?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-cve-causes-new-hotfix-can-the-hotfix-be-considered-stable/m-p/1223944#M123664</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Previously it was mentioned that 10.2.12-h6 was the latest stable version. In light of the new CVEs and the recommendations that come with it, can I verify that 10.2.13-h5 is the new stable version?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 03:58:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-cve-causes-new-hotfix-can-the-hotfix-be-considered-stable/m-p/1223944#M123664</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.Ramesh960545</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-17T03:58:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NEW CVE causes new hotfix, can the hotfix be considered stable?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-cve-causes-new-hotfix-can-the-hotfix-be-considered-stable/m-p/1224016#M123670</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently TAC advisory and firewall both show preferred version to be 10.2.10-h9.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Palo don't tend to update preferred version based on CVEs so you should review if CVE applies to your use case and install hotfix if it does.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/support-pan-os-software-release-guidance/ta-p/258304" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/support-pan-os-software-release-guidance/ta-p/258304&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Raido_Rattameister_1-1742219723051.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/66677iC1BB7DB22E9626D6/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Raido_Rattameister_1-1742219723051.png" alt="Raido_Rattameister_1-1742219723051.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Raido_Rattameister_0-1742219694694.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/66676i267AB3A346DCE2B5/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Raido_Rattameister_0-1742219694694.png" alt="Raido_Rattameister_0-1742219694694.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:57:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-cve-causes-new-hotfix-can-the-hotfix-be-considered-stable/m-p/1224016#M123670</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raido_Rattameister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-17T13:57:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NEW CVE causes new hotfix, can the hotfix be considered stable?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-cve-causes-new-hotfix-can-the-hotfix-be-considered-stable/m-p/1230069#M124387</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15603"&gt;@Raido_Rattameister&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks for sharing this, Raido. I agree it's important to not just rely on the preferred version list but also cross-check CVEs relevant to our environment.&lt;A title="tubidy" href="https://www-tubidy.ws" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt; That link you shared is definitely helpful as a reference: &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/support-pan-os-software-release-guidance/ta-p/258304" target="_self"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/customer-resources/support-pan-os-software-release-guidance/ta-p/258304&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 09:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-cve-causes-new-hotfix-can-the-hotfix-be-considered-stable/m-p/1230069#M124387</guid>
      <dc:creator>albertojaden8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-26T09:53:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

