<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Decryption Profile in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/decryption-profile/m-p/1232077#M124615</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11943"&gt;@kiwi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for response.&amp;nbsp; I am running 11.1.x code&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seems that the need for customers to import missing CA's is common, from what I gather.&amp;nbsp; As you mention, I'd prefer not having to make decryption exceptions.&amp;nbsp; I also didn't want to be in the business of having to upload trusted root CAs and maintaining that list.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I was starting to wonder if a lot of customers leave these checkboxes unchecked in their decryption profiles&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 20:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>securehops</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-18T20:09:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Decryption Profile</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/decryption-profile/m-p/1231846#M124581</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I modified existing decryption rules to add a decryption profile to each of them.&amp;nbsp; In the profile, I have "&lt;SPAN&gt;Block sessions with untrusted issuers" checked.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I'm finding sites with well-known trusted certificates are being blocked due to this.&amp;nbsp; My understanding is Palo has a very limited certificate store.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What's the best/most common way to handle this?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 18:37:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/decryption-profile/m-p/1231846#M124581</guid>
      <dc:creator>securehops</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-16T18:37:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Decryption Profile</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/decryption-profile/m-p/1231898#M124584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/167427"&gt;@securehops&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe there are several steps you can try to improve the situation:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ensure that your firewall's PAN-OS version is reasonably current so you have an updated CA list (&lt;SPAN class="citation-22"&gt;PAN firewalls &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="citation-22"&gt;update their default trusted CA store primarily with major PAN-OS software releases&lt;/SPAN&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Importing missing CAs over creating decryption exclusions (Use decryption exclusions only as a last resort for sites that genuinely break decryption or for specific business/regulatory reasons.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Consider automating the CA trust store management with tools like pan-chainguard for a more proactive approach:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pan.dev/panos/docs/pan-chainguard/" target="_blank"&gt;https://pan.dev/panos/docs/pan-chainguard/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kim.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 07:02:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/decryption-profile/m-p/1231898#M124584</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-17T07:02:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Decryption Profile</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/decryption-profile/m-p/1232077#M124615</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11943"&gt;@kiwi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for response.&amp;nbsp; I am running 11.1.x code&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Seems that the need for customers to import missing CA's is common, from what I gather.&amp;nbsp; As you mention, I'd prefer not having to make decryption exceptions.&amp;nbsp; I also didn't want to be in the business of having to upload trusted root CAs and maintaining that list.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I was starting to wonder if a lot of customers leave these checkboxes unchecked in their decryption profiles&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 20:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/decryption-profile/m-p/1232077#M124615</guid>
      <dc:creator>securehops</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-18T20:09:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

