<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: spanning tree portfast for cisco to palo links in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/spanning-tree-portfast-for-cisco-to-palo-links/m-p/1236569#M125021</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/504213853"&gt;@M.Allen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you please elaborate more on your current design?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the Cisco side, are the switchports connected to the Palo configured as access&amp;nbsp;or trunk. On the Palo,&amp;nbsp;are the interfaces operating in Layer 2, Layer 3, or vWire mode?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 01:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JayGolf</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-25T01:32:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>spanning tree portfast for cisco to palo links</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/spanning-tree-portfast-for-cisco-to-palo-links/m-p/1236434#M125002</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am moving some palo interfaces to a new cisco switch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is the recommended spanning tree configuration on both palo and cisco sides when connecting these devices?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PA(config-if)# spanning-tree port type ?&lt;BR /&gt;edge Consider the interface as edge port (enable portfast)&lt;BR /&gt;network Consider the interface as inter-switch link&lt;BR /&gt;normal Consider the interface as normal spanning tree port&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;should they be setup as normal on the cisco switch? and is there a setting on the palo to do the same?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:11:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/spanning-tree-portfast-for-cisco-to-palo-links/m-p/1236434#M125002</guid>
      <dc:creator>M.Allen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-21T11:11:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: spanning tree portfast for cisco to palo links</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/spanning-tree-portfast-for-cisco-to-palo-links/m-p/1236569#M125021</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/504213853"&gt;@M.Allen&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you please elaborate more on your current design?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the Cisco side, are the switchports connected to the Palo configured as access&amp;nbsp;or trunk. On the Palo,&amp;nbsp;are the interfaces operating in Layer 2, Layer 3, or vWire mode?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 01:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/spanning-tree-portfast-for-cisco-to-palo-links/m-p/1236569#M125021</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayGolf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-25T01:32:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

