<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SCM Compatibility in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/scm-compatibility/m-p/1243180#M125652</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Everyone!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am looking for insight on the possibility of bringing PA-220s and PA-220Rs into SCM Pro for visibility &lt;EM&gt;and&lt;/EM&gt; configuration.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My research has led to conflicting results:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager/activation-and-onboarding/strata-cloud-manager-prerequisites" target="_blank"&gt;Strata Cloud Manager Prerequisites&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;indicates that the Advanced Routing Engine (ARE) is a requirement for onboarding a device into SCM.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A style="font-family: inherit; background-color: #ffffff;" href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/ngfw/networking/advanced-routing" target="_blank"&gt;Advanced Routing&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;states that the PA-200 series does not support the ARE, and therefore the PA-200 series &lt;EM&gt;cannot be onboarded into SCM.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A style="font-family: inherit; background-color: #ffffff;" href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/common-services/device-associations/hardware-model-compatibility" target="_blank"&gt;Device Model Compatibility&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;states the PA-220 &lt;EM&gt;can be associated with SCM&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can anyone confirm if the PA-200 series can be onboarded into SCM? If so, is this only for visibility and not for configuration?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Nohash4u&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;LI-PRODUCT title="Strata Cloud Manager" id="Strata_Cloud_Manager"&gt;&lt;/LI-PRODUCT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 22:36:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nohash4u</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-12-04T22:36:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SCM Compatibility</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/scm-compatibility/m-p/1243180#M125652</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Everyone!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am looking for insight on the possibility of bringing PA-220s and PA-220Rs into SCM Pro for visibility &lt;EM&gt;and&lt;/EM&gt; configuration.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My research has led to conflicting results:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/strata-cloud-manager/activation-and-onboarding/strata-cloud-manager-prerequisites" target="_blank"&gt;Strata Cloud Manager Prerequisites&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;indicates that the Advanced Routing Engine (ARE) is a requirement for onboarding a device into SCM.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A style="font-family: inherit; background-color: #ffffff;" href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/ngfw/networking/advanced-routing" target="_blank"&gt;Advanced Routing&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;states that the PA-200 series does not support the ARE, and therefore the PA-200 series &lt;EM&gt;cannot be onboarded into SCM.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A style="font-family: inherit; background-color: #ffffff;" href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/common-services/device-associations/hardware-model-compatibility" target="_blank"&gt;Device Model Compatibility&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;states the PA-220 &lt;EM&gt;can be associated with SCM&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can anyone confirm if the PA-200 series can be onboarded into SCM? If so, is this only for visibility and not for configuration?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Nohash4u&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;LI-PRODUCT title="Strata Cloud Manager" id="Strata_Cloud_Manager"&gt;&lt;/LI-PRODUCT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 22:36:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/scm-compatibility/m-p/1243180#M125652</guid>
      <dc:creator>nohash4u</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-04T22:36:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCM Compatibility</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/scm-compatibility/m-p/1243193#M125653</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/65137099"&gt;@nohash4u&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Advanced Routing Engine (ARE) requirement only applies to firewalls that actually support ARE. SCM enforces this on those platforms because config pushes will fail if the device’s routing stack mode doesn’t match the tenant.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For models like the PA-220, which don’t support ARE at all, the requirement doesn’t apply. I confirm that you can onboard the PA-220 into SCM and will have full visibility, config, and policy management.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 01:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/scm-compatibility/m-p/1243193#M125653</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayGolf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-05T01:23:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SCM Compatibility</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/scm-compatibility/m-p/1243242#M125655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/220841"&gt;@JayGolf&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for clarifying!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 17:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/scm-compatibility/m-p/1243242#M125655</guid>
      <dc:creator>nohash4u</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-05T17:22:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

