<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Concern Regarding Inclusion of Open-Source Projects in &amp;quot;Shareware and Freeware&amp;quot; Category in Advanced URL Filtering in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/concern-regarding-inclusion-of-open-source-projects-in-quot/m-p/1245228#M125803</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I know this is an old thread, but I couldn't agree more. I would very much like to see Palo implement an "&lt;STRONG&gt;open-source-software&lt;/STRONG&gt;" URL category or something similar. This causes friction at our org. because we block&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;shareware-and-freeware&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Furthermore, there is no consistency with how these sites are categorized.&amp;nbsp; As of now, videolan.org and nmap.org are classified as&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;shareware-and-freeware&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;while libreoffice.org and wireshark.org are classified as&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;computer-and-internet-info&lt;/STRONG&gt;. I can go down the list of industry standard open-source software that is inconsistently classified because there is not a good category to fit them into.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 20:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>eodelberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-01-08T20:03:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Concern Regarding Inclusion of Open-Source Projects in "Shareware and Freeware" Category in Advanced URL Filtering</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/concern-regarding-inclusion-of-open-source-projects-in-quot/m-p/593677#M118165</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Palo Alto Community,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am writing to raise a concern regarding the &lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/advanced-url-filtering/administration/url-filtering-basics/url-categories" target="_self"&gt;categorization of websites&lt;/A&gt; under Palo Alto Networks' Advanced URL Filtering. Specifically, I have noticed that sites providing access to open-source projects (such as &lt;A href="https://github.com" target="_self"&gt;Github&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="ui-provider ru rv ji rw rx ry rz sa sb sc sd se sf sg sh si sj sk sl sm sn so sp sq sr ss st su sv sw sx sy sz ta tb"&gt; &lt;A class="fui-Link ___1rxvrpe f2hkw1w f3rmtva f1ewtqcl fyind8e f1k6fduh f1w7gpdv fk6fouc fjoy568 figsok6 f1hu3pq6 f11qmguv f19f4twv f1tyq0we f1g0x7ka fhxju0i f1qch9an f1cnd47f fqv5qza f1vmzxwi f1o700av f13mvf36 f1cmlufx f9n3di6 f1ids18y f1tx3yz7 f1deo86v f1eh06m1 f1iescvh fhgqx19 f1olyrje f1p93eir f1nev41a f1h8hb77 f1lqvz6u f10aw75t fsle3fq f17ae5zn" title="http://git-scm.com/" href="http://git-scm.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Link git-scm.com"&gt;git-scm.com&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;or&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://sourceforge.net" target="_self"&gt;sourceforge.net&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;) are included within the "&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Shareware and Freeware&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;" category. According to the definition provided on the&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/advanced-url-filtering/administration/url-filtering-basics/url-categories" target="_self"&gt;Palo Alto Networks website&lt;/A&gt;, this category encompasses:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Sites that provide access to software, screensavers, icons, wallpapers, utilities, ringtones, themes, or widgets for free or donations. &lt;U&gt;Includes open-source projects&lt;/U&gt;."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;While I understand the necessity of maintaining robust security measures and categorizing websites to prevent access to potentially harmful content, I am concerned about the implications of including open-source projects in this category. Here are a few key points of concern:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Conceptual Difference:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;There is a clear demarcation and conceptual difference between shareware/freeware and open-source software. According to the &lt;A href="https://opensource.org/osd" target="_self"&gt;Open Source Initiative (OSI)&lt;/A&gt;, open-source software is defined by several key criteria:
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Free Redistribution:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Software can be freely shared and redistributed.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Source Code Availability:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Source code must be accessible, allowing users to modify and share modifications.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Derived Works:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Licenses must permit modifications and derived works.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Non-discrimination:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Licenses cannot discriminate against any person or group.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
Open-source software is typically characterized by its transparent codebase, community-driven development, and rigorous peer-review processes that enhance its security and reliability.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;This stands in contrast to shareware and freeware, which often include proprietary software distributed for free, sometimes with limitations or bundled adware&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Including it under the same category as shareware and freeware, which sometimes includes adware or malware, could lead to misconceptions about the safety and reliability of open-source software.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Access Restrictions:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Many IT organizations heavily rely on open-source software as a foundational part of their infrastructure and development processes. Blocking access to open-source project sites could significantly hinder these organizations by restricting access to critical tools, libraries, and frameworks necessary for development, operations, and innovation. The reliance on open-source software is so prevalent that many systems, from web servers to development tools, are built and maintained using open-source technologies.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Perception and Usage:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;This categorization might inadvertently associate open-source projects with less secure software categories, potentially discouraging their use within organizations that rely on Palo Alto Networks' security solutions.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am interested in understanding the rationale behind this categorization and whether there are any plans to re-evaluate or refine the categories to better &lt;STRONG&gt;distinguish between different types of non-commercial software&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Specifically, I believe that separating open-source projects from shareware and freeware could help avoid unintended consequences and better reflect the nature of these projects.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would appreciate any insights or updates from the Palo Alto Networks team on this matter. Additionally, I welcome input from other community members who might have encountered similar issues or have suggestions on how to address this concern.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your attention to this matter.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/concern-regarding-inclusion-of-open-source-projects-in-quot/m-p/593677#M118165</guid>
      <dc:creator>josealonso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-31T17:13:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concern Regarding Inclusion of Open-Source Projects in "Shareware and Freeware" Category in Advanced URL Filtering</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/concern-regarding-inclusion-of-open-source-projects-in-quot/m-p/594624#M118349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I completely agree with your point the more granular categorization the more granular control on the traffic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/concern-regarding-inclusion-of-open-source-projects-in-quot/m-p/594624#M118349</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edsnow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-12T13:11:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concern Regarding Inclusion of Open-Source Projects in "Shareware and Freeware" Category in Advanced URL Filtering</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/concern-regarding-inclusion-of-open-source-projects-in-quot/m-p/1238005#M125138</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/498904011"&gt;@josealonso&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know that this is not completely fulfilling request in your post, but Palo Alto is going to re-categorize "github.com" and "podman.io" from "&lt;STRONG&gt;Shareware and Freeware&lt;/STRONG&gt;" to "&lt;STRONG&gt;Computer and Internet Info&lt;/STRONG&gt;":&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PavelK_0-1757983244704.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/69249i564037492C0EB94C/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PavelK_0-1757983244704.png" alt="PavelK_0-1757983244704.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pavel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 00:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/concern-regarding-inclusion-of-open-source-projects-in-quot/m-p/1238005#M125138</guid>
      <dc:creator>PavelK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-16T00:41:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concern Regarding Inclusion of Open-Source Projects in "Shareware and Freeware" Category in Advanced URL Filtering</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/concern-regarding-inclusion-of-open-source-projects-in-quot/m-p/1245228#M125803</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know this is an old thread, but I couldn't agree more. I would very much like to see Palo implement an "&lt;STRONG&gt;open-source-software&lt;/STRONG&gt;" URL category or something similar. This causes friction at our org. because we block&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;shareware-and-freeware&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Furthermore, there is no consistency with how these sites are categorized.&amp;nbsp; As of now, videolan.org and nmap.org are classified as&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;shareware-and-freeware&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;while libreoffice.org and wireshark.org are classified as&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;computer-and-internet-info&lt;/STRONG&gt;. I can go down the list of industry standard open-source software that is inconsistently classified because there is not a good category to fit them into.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 20:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/concern-regarding-inclusion-of-open-source-projects-in-quot/m-p/1245228#M125803</guid>
      <dc:creator>eodelberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-08T20:03:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

