<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Reason Why Logs Are Received by SLS but Not Stored in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reason-why-logs-are-received-by-sls-but-not-stored/m-p/1247352#M125958</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/204402"&gt;@ym-higashi&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you actually have enough licenses to cover all of the devices and have you setup the association properly?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 18:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-03T18:59:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Reason Why Logs Are Received by SLS but Not Stored</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reason-why-logs-are-received-by-sls-but-not-stored/m-p/1247311#M125950</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In Strata Logging Service, ACTUAL RETENTION DAYS was shown as 0 for certain log types (such as firewall_traffic).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Meanwhile, we observed that system and dns_security logs have increasing ACTUAL RETENTION DAYS.&lt;BR /&gt;I understanding is that when ACTUAL RETENTION DAYS is 0, it indicates that SLS is not retaining logs for that log type.&lt;BR /&gt;We have confirmed that CONFIGURED RETENTION DAYS is set to 366 days.&lt;BR /&gt;Additionally, the Dashboard → Incoming Logs Rate confirms that the firewall is successfully sending logs to SLS.&lt;BR /&gt;Why is SLS receiving these logs but not storing them?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 11:06:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reason-why-logs-are-received-by-sls-but-not-stored/m-p/1247311#M125950</guid>
      <dc:creator>ym-higashi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-03T11:06:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reason Why Logs Are Received by SLS but Not Stored</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reason-why-logs-are-received-by-sls-but-not-stored/m-p/1247352#M125958</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/204402"&gt;@ym-higashi&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you actually have enough licenses to cover all of the devices and have you setup the association properly?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 18:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reason-why-logs-are-received-by-sls-but-not-stored/m-p/1247352#M125958</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-03T18:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Reason Why Logs Are Received by SLS but Not Stored</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reason-why-logs-are-received-by-sls-but-not-stored/m-p/1247537#M125968</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/204402"&gt;@ym-higashi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In Strata Logging Service, ACTUAL RETENTION DAYS was shown as 0 for certain log types (such as firewall_traffic).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Meanwhile, we observed that system and dns_security logs have increasing ACTUAL RETENTION DAYS.&lt;BR /&gt;I understanding is that when ACTUAL RETENTION DAYS is 0, it indicates that SLS is not retaining logs for that log type.&lt;BR /&gt;We have confirmed that CONFIGURED RETENTION DAYS is set to 366 days.&lt;BR /&gt;Additionally, the Dashboard → Incoming Logs Rate confirms that the firewall is successfully sending logs to SLS.&lt;BR /&gt;Why is SLS receiving these logs but not storing them?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I suspect there's something else going on.&amp;nbsp; A while back maybe 2-4 months Palo Alto changed how they billed for SLS storage.&amp;nbsp; Now customers just get a year, you shouldn't be paying for "X" amount of TBs anymore.&amp;nbsp; This might be something you should bring up with your Palo account team.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As an example...there's no way we're paying for 1800 days for storage, but Palo has adjusted the product:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Brandon_Wertz_0-1770311964082.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/70593iD61199FA878F976F/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Brandon_Wertz_0-1770311964082.png" alt="Brandon_Wertz_0-1770311964082.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 17:19:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/reason-why-logs-are-received-by-sls-but-not-stored/m-p/1247537#M125968</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-05T17:19:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

