<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Active - Active firewall deployment across two data centers in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/1248568#M126017</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Which is recommended design of PaloAlto firewalls in active-active datacenters with&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;VXLAN/EVPN switch fabric with anycast gateway? Does it support an active active with network and compute in active-active with stretched VXLAN fabric underlay between the two datacenters?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:27:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RSumalal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-19T07:27:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Active - Active firewall deployment across two data centers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/329455#M83632</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are exploring the firewall deployment options for one of our customers who have a requirement to stretch few VLANs across 2 data centers most probably using VXLAN/EVPN. The options currently being explored are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Active-Standby firewalls in each data center&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Active-Active firewall&amp;nbsp; with one node in each data center&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any design/deployment references for these scenarios especially how to avoid double firewalling and the possible scenarios for asymmetric routing and how to avoid them.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 16:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/329455#M83632</guid>
      <dc:creator>MGRashmi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-22T16:23:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active - Active firewall deployment across two data centers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/329686#M83675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you can avoid asymmetric routing by not deploying in Active/Active &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;do both datacenters need to be 'hot' or is there one warm standby? do both need active connections to the outside and will the bandwidth needed exceed the VXLAN/EVPN capability?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd try to void A/A as that complicates your configuration tremendously with very little ROI (you'll also need to enable HA3 and make sure jumbo frames are supported over the VXLAN/EVPN etc)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2020 21:17:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/329686#M83675</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-24T21:17:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active - Active firewall deployment across two data centers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/329742#M83681</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both datacenters need to be "Hot" and will have active connections outside. The bandwidth will not exceed VXLAN/EVPN. I am trying to understand if there are any deployment guides/design options for deploying A/A across data centers in Palo Alto.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 11:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/329742#M83681</guid>
      <dc:creator>MGRashmi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-25T11:07:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active - Active firewall deployment across two data centers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/1248568#M126017</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which is recommended design of PaloAlto firewalls in active-active datacenters with&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;VXLAN/EVPN switch fabric with anycast gateway? Does it support an active active with network and compute in active-active with stretched VXLAN fabric underlay between the two datacenters?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:27:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/1248568#M126017</guid>
      <dc:creator>RSumalal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-19T07:27:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active - Active firewall deployment across two data centers</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/1248603#M126019</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You might want to reach out to your sales engineer to see if they have any ideas.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 18:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/active-active-firewall-deployment-across-two-data-centers/m-p/1248603#M126019</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-19T18:12:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

