<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Higher gainer low threat in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/higher-gainer-low-threat/m-p/17313#M12641</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have an app that is being seen a lot in the logs but has a low rating and is skewing you results is it possible to exclude it from the threat prevention analysis?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 17:59:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-05T17:59:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Higher gainer low threat</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/higher-gainer-low-threat/m-p/17313#M12641</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have an app that is being seen a lot in the logs but has a low rating and is skewing you results is it possible to exclude it from the threat prevention analysis?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 17:59:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/higher-gainer-low-threat/m-p/17313#M12641</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-05T17:59:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Higher gainer low threat</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/higher-gainer-low-threat/m-p/17314#M12642</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could always configure a special security rule for that application, and don't assign a security profile to it. It would need to be above any more generic rule that application would match, to prevent it from getting hit by the wrong rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Policies &amp;gt; Security &amp;gt; Add&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Configure the application to be the one you don't want to get details on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do not select any profiles (unless you still want to do virus scanning, etc.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Select logging as desired (none, or the default of log at session end)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Greg Wesson&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 21:02:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/higher-gainer-low-threat/m-p/17314#M12642</guid>
      <dc:creator>gwesson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-05T21:02:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Higher gainer low threat</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/higher-gainer-low-threat/m-p/17315#M12643</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interested thought, it has and exceptions list but it does not seem to mean it is not letting it through but allowing a different actions than the original rule but ignoring it isn't an options&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 12:31:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/higher-gainer-low-threat/m-p/17315#M12643</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-06T12:31:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

