<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Prisma Cloud defender agent unable to identify Red Hat back ported patches causing false positives in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/prisma-cloud-defender-agent-unable-to-identify-red-hat-back/m-p/1254960#M126505</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wanted to throw this out here to see if anyone has run into this issue and hopefully found a solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been reviewing vulnerabilities identified by the defender agent and have noticed that it is consistently unable to detect when Red Hat has back ported a patch to specific packages. It seems, despite being Certified for Red Hat Vulnerability Scanning it is still flagging red hat patched packages as affected.&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/prisma-cloud-offers-certified-red-hat-vulnerability-scanning-for/ba-p/592847" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/prisma-cloud-offers-certified-red-hat-vulnerability-scanning-for/ba-p/592847&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hoping anyone else has run into this and has found a work around&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 18:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GabeColonaco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-05-28T18:17:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Prisma Cloud defender agent unable to identify Red Hat back ported patches causing false positives</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/prisma-cloud-defender-agent-unable-to-identify-red-hat-back/m-p/1254960#M126505</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wanted to throw this out here to see if anyone has run into this issue and hopefully found a solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been reviewing vulnerabilities identified by the defender agent and have noticed that it is consistently unable to detect when Red Hat has back ported a patch to specific packages. It seems, despite being Certified for Red Hat Vulnerability Scanning it is still flagging red hat patched packages as affected.&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/prisma-cloud-offers-certified-red-hat-vulnerability-scanning-for/ba-p/592847" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/prisma-cloud-offers-certified-red-hat-vulnerability-scanning-for/ba-p/592847&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hoping anyone else has run into this and has found a work around&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 18:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/prisma-cloud-defender-agent-unable-to-identify-red-hat-back/m-p/1254960#M126505</guid>
      <dc:creator>GabeColonaco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-28T18:17:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

