<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic New Internet connection - break up HA pair to provision? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-internet-connection-break-up-ha-pair-to-provision/m-p/1261366#M126848</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a pair of PA440s as our main firewall, with a fairly complex but not totally weird configuration - all physical interfaces in use, some with sub-interfaces, NAT to some inbound servers, VPN, URL filtering, etc etc.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have a new Internet connection - same provider, but with upgraded service that precluded just turning up the speed.&amp;nbsp; It's a different physical line to different vendor equipment, with a new external IP range.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm thinking about how I would test and implement this, and here's what I think:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- disable HA so that both PA440s are now standalone - with the same configuration as each other, right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- keep A on the old connection, leave all connections the same&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- patch B's Internet interface into the new connection, and shutdown everything else except mgmt&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- reconfigure B for the new IP range, and a different IP from my main range on the internal trusted interface&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So then, I could test by shutting down A and bringing up interfaces on B (and changing internal routing as needed) and at least see that outbound-only traffic was behaving, right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And then, update public DNS to reflect the changed external range and make sure I didn't typo the NAT policies.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Obviously, this is high-level overview.&amp;nbsp; But - am I insane to think this will work (for instance, will the passive of the HA pair have a usable config on it, or will it revert to something else)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 17:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HHRINetwork</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-08-07T17:49:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New Internet connection - break up HA pair to provision?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-internet-connection-break-up-ha-pair-to-provision/m-p/1261366#M126848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a pair of PA440s as our main firewall, with a fairly complex but not totally weird configuration - all physical interfaces in use, some with sub-interfaces, NAT to some inbound servers, VPN, URL filtering, etc etc.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have a new Internet connection - same provider, but with upgraded service that precluded just turning up the speed.&amp;nbsp; It's a different physical line to different vendor equipment, with a new external IP range.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm thinking about how I would test and implement this, and here's what I think:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- disable HA so that both PA440s are now standalone - with the same configuration as each other, right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- keep A on the old connection, leave all connections the same&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- patch B's Internet interface into the new connection, and shutdown everything else except mgmt&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;- reconfigure B for the new IP range, and a different IP from my main range on the internal trusted interface&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So then, I could test by shutting down A and bringing up interfaces on B (and changing internal routing as needed) and at least see that outbound-only traffic was behaving, right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And then, update public DNS to reflect the changed external range and make sure I didn't typo the NAT policies.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Obviously, this is high-level overview.&amp;nbsp; But - am I insane to think this will work (for instance, will the passive of the HA pair have a usable config on it, or will it revert to something else)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 17:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-internet-connection-break-up-ha-pair-to-provision/m-p/1261366#M126848</guid>
      <dc:creator>HHRINetwork</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-07T17:49:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

