<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Throughput of an Active/Active HA pair in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/throughput-of-an-active-active-ha-pair/m-p/165#M128</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Palo Alto Active/Active is not at all about capacity, so you won't find it mentioned in the documentation.&amp;nbsp; The use cases are just two:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Asymmetrical routing - there are two active paths and source and reply traffic can appear on different links.&amp;nbsp; The A/A setup allows the sessions to still be matched and processed by the original firewall.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Dynamic routing protocol load balancing - There are two paths that traffic could take through the firewalls and that path is selected by routing preferences in dynamic routing protocols outside the PA firewall.&amp;nbsp; The inactive path interfaces must remain up for the dynamic peers to maintain their routing tables.&amp;nbsp; In an active/passive design the passive firewall links are down and the peers on the secondary path cannot remain up.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See the discussion in the Active/Active Tech note for more details.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-2541"&gt;Configuring Active/Active HA PAN-OS 4.0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2014 13:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-11T13:21:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Throughput of an Active/Active HA pair</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/throughput-of-an-active-active-ha-pair/m-p/163#M126</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe that in an active/active HA pair the total throughput is equal to the performance of a single box, not the sum of both boxes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the PA-5050, the throughput for an Active/Active HA pair is 5Gbps with threat prevention.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where is this documented?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to show it to management&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dave&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 19:34:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/throughput-of-an-active-active-ha-pair/m-p/163#M126</guid>
      <dc:creator>RaveDave92656</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-09T19:34:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of an Active/Active HA pair</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/throughput-of-an-active-active-ha-pair/m-p/164#M127</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Dave,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Active/Active mode, Both devices in the cluster are &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;active&lt;/SPAN&gt; processing and passing traffic:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;gt; Devices back each other, taking over primary ownership if either one fails&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;gt; Both &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;devices load&lt;/SPAN&gt; share the traffic&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;gt; w/o external load balancers, traffic &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;is&lt;/SPAN&gt; “shared” between devices based on routes on up/downstream devices, or&amp;nbsp; manipulating default gateways&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;BUT REMEMBER&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; No increase in session capacity&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Not designed to increase throughput&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;recomend&lt;/SPAN&gt; you to contact with your Palo Alto SE to get a proper documentation for the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 20:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/throughput-of-an-active-active-ha-pair/m-p/164#M127</guid>
      <dc:creator>HULK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-09T20:31:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Throughput of an Active/Active HA pair</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/throughput-of-an-active-active-ha-pair/m-p/165#M128</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In Palo Alto Active/Active is not at all about capacity, so you won't find it mentioned in the documentation.&amp;nbsp; The use cases are just two:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Asymmetrical routing - there are two active paths and source and reply traffic can appear on different links.&amp;nbsp; The A/A setup allows the sessions to still be matched and processed by the original firewall.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Dynamic routing protocol load balancing - There are two paths that traffic could take through the firewalls and that path is selected by routing preferences in dynamic routing protocols outside the PA firewall.&amp;nbsp; The inactive path interfaces must remain up for the dynamic peers to maintain their routing tables.&amp;nbsp; In an active/passive design the passive firewall links are down and the peers on the secondary path cannot remain up.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See the discussion in the Active/Active Tech note for more details.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-2541"&gt;Configuring Active/Active HA PAN-OS 4.0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2014 13:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/throughput-of-an-active-active-ha-pair/m-p/165#M128</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-11T13:21:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

