<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: L2 with Aggregate in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/l2-with-aggregate/m-p/1769#M1312</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hopefully this thread will help you: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/thread/1459?tstart=0"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/thread/1459?tstart=0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that PAN currently doesnt support 802.3ad (LACP) but it supports PAgP (Etherchannel) if im not mistaken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the PAN you setup an aggregated ethernet group which you bond to each physical interface. Then in the configuration of the ae-group you setup the ip address (if needed).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One note is to verify which port-channel load-balance method you use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think srcmac+dstmac is default which makes that your extra interfaces in the ae-group will basically just idle. If you change this into src-dst-ip or src-dst-port you will get a better loaddistribution (given that your equipment supports such loadbalance method). My favorite choice is to use srcip+srcport+dstip+dstport as loadbalance method (again given that your equipment supports such setting).&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For more information: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:22:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-29T09:22:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>L2 with Aggregate</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/l2-with-aggregate/m-p/1768#M1311</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; We would like to configure L2 with Aggregate between PANOS (4.1 - PA5050) with cisco switch&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; After we do L2 Aggregate&amp;nbsp; , and assign IP Address on VLAN , we find that when we ping to this IP Address , there are many request-timeout.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - If we configure L2 and set IP on VLAN only (without aggregate), there is no problem&amp;nbsp; (Ping smoothly)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; - On cisco switch , we use channel group mode on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Please advice, I'm a new for Palo FW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kamol&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:05:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/l2-with-aggregate/m-p/1768#M1311</guid>
      <dc:creator>apirachat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-29T07:05:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: L2 with Aggregate</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/l2-with-aggregate/m-p/1769#M1312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hopefully this thread will help you: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/thread/1459?tstart=0"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/thread/1459?tstart=0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that PAN currently doesnt support 802.3ad (LACP) but it supports PAgP (Etherchannel) if im not mistaken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the PAN you setup an aggregated ethernet group which you bond to each physical interface. Then in the configuration of the ae-group you setup the ip address (if needed).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One note is to verify which port-channel load-balance method you use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think srcmac+dstmac is default which makes that your extra interfaces in the ae-group will basically just idle. If you change this into src-dst-ip or src-dst-port you will get a better loaddistribution (given that your equipment supports such loadbalance method). My favorite choice is to use srcip+srcport+dstip+dstport as loadbalance method (again given that your equipment supports such setting).&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For more information: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:22:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/l2-with-aggregate/m-p/1769#M1312</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-29T09:22:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

