<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PA-4000 series and agg/dual links in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-4000-series-and-agg-dual-links/m-p/18333#M13365</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking to upgrade my company firewall (PA-2050) to one of the PA-4000 series to be the internet gateway for all our US sites.&amp;nbsp; Anyone here is using PA-4000 with aggregate links with Cisco switches?&amp;nbsp; I'm thinking to have aggregate links for both Trust and Untrust and also dual path to our two Coreswitchs for redudancy as well.&amp;nbsp; I know the 4000 series support aggregate links but not sure if I will be able to do this on both of my switches.&amp;nbsp; So in short, Core1 and Core 2 switch will have Etherchannel links to the PA and all four ports on the PA will belong to Trust zone. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Tevin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>akatev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-23T20:13:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA-4000 series and agg/dual links</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-4000-series-and-agg-dual-links/m-p/18333#M13365</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking to upgrade my company firewall (PA-2050) to one of the PA-4000 series to be the internet gateway for all our US sites.&amp;nbsp; Anyone here is using PA-4000 with aggregate links with Cisco switches?&amp;nbsp; I'm thinking to have aggregate links for both Trust and Untrust and also dual path to our two Coreswitchs for redudancy as well.&amp;nbsp; I know the 4000 series support aggregate links but not sure if I will be able to do this on both of my switches.&amp;nbsp; So in short, Core1 and Core 2 switch will have Etherchannel links to the PA and all four ports on the PA will belong to Trust zone. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Tevin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-4000-series-and-agg-dual-links/m-p/18333#M13365</guid>
      <dc:creator>akatev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-23T20:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-4000 series and agg/dual links</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-4000-series-and-agg-dual-links/m-p/18334#M13366</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'd be able to connect the aggregate ports asigned to the Trust Zone on the PAN to two differnent Etherchannel connections on the Ciscos.&amp;nbsp; Just be aware that the PAN won't support LACP traffic in instances where it is participating in link aggregation and we assume static setup of the port configuration.&amp;nbsp; The PAN will pass through LACP traffic in VWire mode, where it is not doing link aggregation. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a link to an article on link aggregation which you may or may not have seen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1098"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1098&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-4000-series-and-agg-dual-links/m-p/18334#M13366</guid>
      <dc:creator>nrice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-26T18:09:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

