<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using Captive Portal for Untrust to Trust in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-captive-portal-for-untrust-to-trust/m-p/19781#M14436</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it's possible and it's exactly what I'm doing on my box.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI, I have a static public IP address and am using many-to-one NAT (PAT) from inside to outside network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Authentications I tried are local, Kerberos and LDAP (so last two with Active Directory integration). All working but the AD integration really helps if you are already using user-id&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a rather basic setup, only captive portal, no NTLM or session cookies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Koen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-07T17:19:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using Captive Portal for Untrust to Trust</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-captive-portal-for-untrust-to-trust/m-p/19778#M14433</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to use captive portal to force a user from the untrust side to authenticat before they can see port 22?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-captive-portal-for-untrust-to-trust/m-p/19778#M14433</guid>
      <dc:creator>SoftwareMedia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T22:48:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Captive Portal for Untrust to Trust</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-captive-portal-for-untrust-to-trust/m-p/19779#M14434</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Captive Portal is more commonly used with traffic going from a trusted to an untrusted zone.&amp;nbsp; It may work with traffic originating in the untrust zone, depending on your network configuration.&amp;nbsp; Please contact Support so that you can discuss your options with them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-captive-portal-for-untrust-to-trust/m-p/19779#M14434</guid>
      <dc:creator>nrice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-14T01:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Captive Portal for Untrust to Trust</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-captive-portal-for-untrust-to-trust/m-p/19780#M14435</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just for interest sake, is this possible and has this been done anywhere?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 09:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-captive-portal-for-untrust-to-trust/m-p/19780#M14435</guid>
      <dc:creator>Quinton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-07T09:54:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Captive Portal for Untrust to Trust</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-captive-portal-for-untrust-to-trust/m-p/19781#M14436</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes it's possible and it's exactly what I'm doing on my box.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI, I have a static public IP address and am using many-to-one NAT (PAT) from inside to outside network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Authentications I tried are local, Kerberos and LDAP (so last two with Active Directory integration). All working but the AD integration really helps if you are already using user-id&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a rather basic setup, only captive portal, no NTLM or session cookies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Koen.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-captive-portal-for-untrust-to-trust/m-p/19781#M14436</guid>
      <dc:creator>KP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-07T17:19:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

