<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Security policy to allow YouTube in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-to-allow-youtube/m-p/20574#M15026</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should not block, if you have configured the security policy with application " YouTube". Could you please let us know from Monitor &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Traffic logs&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt; :&lt;/SPAN&gt; While the traffic is hitting the second rule, what application it is showing..?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the first security policy is pretty open, i.e Source=any, destination =any, Application= &lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;acebook&lt;/SPAN&gt;, &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;linkedin&lt;/SPAN&gt;, &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;twitter&lt;/SPAN&gt; and &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;youtube&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; and Service= Any, Action permit...?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HULK</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-15T02:27:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Security policy to allow YouTube</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-to-allow-youtube/m-p/20573#M15025</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a security policy that allow 4 application: facebook, linkedin, twitter and youtube. There is no URL filtering applied, and 3 applications work fine, but youtube does not. the traffic bypasses to another policy below that had URL filtering and which blocks streaming. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If no URL filtering is applied, should not I be able to go to www.youtube.com when hitting the policy allowing the 4 applications?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 00:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-to-allow-youtube/m-p/20573#M15025</guid>
      <dc:creator>MMCiobanu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-15T00:01:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security policy to allow YouTube</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-to-allow-youtube/m-p/20574#M15026</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should not block, if you have configured the security policy with application " YouTube". Could you please let us know from Monitor &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Traffic logs&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt; :&lt;/SPAN&gt; While the traffic is hitting the second rule, what application it is showing..?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the first security policy is pretty open, i.e Source=any, destination =any, Application= &lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;acebook&lt;/SPAN&gt;, &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;linkedin&lt;/SPAN&gt;, &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;twitter&lt;/SPAN&gt; and &lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;youtube&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; and Service= Any, Action permit...?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 02:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-to-allow-youtube/m-p/20574#M15026</guid>
      <dc:creator>HULK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-15T02:27:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security policy to allow YouTube</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-to-allow-youtube/m-p/20575#M15027</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first policy is open: Source=any, destination =any, Application= acebook, linkedin, twitter and youtube and Service= Any, Action allow;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The traffic hits the rule, but application is "incomplete" and when looking at URL filtering, it show as blocked by the second rule where streaming-media is blocked; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 03:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-to-allow-youtube/m-p/20575#M15027</guid>
      <dc:creator>MMCiobanu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-16T03:15:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Security policy to allow YouTube</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-to-allow-youtube/m-p/20576#M15028</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is what the Traffic log shows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="traffic.JPG.jpg" class="jive-image" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/legacyfs/online/12177_traffic.JPG.jpg" style="width: 620px; height: 19px;" /&gt;\&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and this is what the URL filtering log shows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="URL LOG.JPG.jpg" class="jive-image" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/legacyfs/online/12178_URL LOG.JPG.jpg" style="width: 620px; height: 12px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These are the two policies:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="POLICY.JPG.jpg" class="jive-image" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/legacyfs/online/12179_POLICY.JPG.jpg" style="width: 620px; height: 56px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; the first one allowing the applications, including youtube and no URL filtering applied. the second one has a URL filter applied, which blocks streaming. But, the application should be allowed by the first policy and I should be able to access www.youtube.com.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:34:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/security-policy-to-allow-youtube/m-p/20576#M15028</guid>
      <dc:creator>MMCiobanu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-17T14:34:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

