<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA 2020 Active/Passive Cluster on SFP Ports in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2020-active-passive-cluster-on-sfp-ports/m-p/22925#M16716</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Mikand,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thnaks for the answer. I aggree that recomended is to use dedicated HA ports for Clustering, but as I said I am running 2020 PA ,which does not have a dedicated ports for HA, so I have to use any ports for HA(HA1&amp;amp; HA2). But I also have a contraints of distance between the two PA as they are placed in two different buildings. so the only choice will be to use the fiber for HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>itsecll</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-31T04:58:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA 2020 Active/Passive Cluster on SFP Ports</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2020-active-passive-cluster-on-sfp-ports/m-p/22923#M16714</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two&amp;nbsp; 2020 Palo-Alto firewalls with serial no.0004C102807 and 0004C102848. I have to configure them in Active /Passive Cluster. As per the design the two PA Firewalls are not in the same location and they are at different locations and Ethernet Cable (Cat-6) will not be laid between the two Buildings(becoz of distance constraint). However I have a Fibre connectivity between the Two Buildings. Also in my 2020 PA boxes I have two SFP ports. Can I use both of&amp;nbsp; them for the HA(HA1 and HA2)? I was going through the PA HA configuration Vedio on the website and I saw for HA in 4000 series which is having two Buildin port&amp;nbsp; as HA1 and HA2. The vedio recommended that HA2 should be a cross over cable. Will the same apply for PA 2020 firewall. If this holds true how can I manage to connect two firewall through UTP as I have only fiber connectivity between the PA firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please advice.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:27:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2020-active-passive-cluster-on-sfp-ports/m-p/22923#M16714</guid>
      <dc:creator>itsecll</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-30T18:27:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2020 Active/Passive Cluster on SFP Ports</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2020-active-passive-cluster-on-sfp-ports/m-p/22924#M16715</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;According to &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://support.paloaltonetworks.com/index.php?option=com_pan&amp;amp;task=dl_tech_doc&amp;amp;filename=HA-Active-Active-Tech-Note.pdf"&gt;https://support.paloaltonetworks.com/index.php?option=com_pan&amp;amp;task=dl_tech_doc&amp;amp;filename=HA-Active-Active-Tech-Note.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; you should be fine.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The HA1 is used for mgmtplane sync and HA2 (and HA3) is for dataplane sync.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The recommendation is to use the dedicated HA1 port (if available) along with a fiberconverter (if you need fiber between the sites) instead of using builtin sfp due to the fact that when using an in-band port (builtin sfp or other port not labeled HA1) the control messages will be following a less direct route for the controlplane through the dataplane. If the dataplane for some reason fails the HA1 sync (which syncs mgmtplane) might get confused.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2020-active-passive-cluster-on-sfp-ports/m-p/22924#M16715</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-30T22:25:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2020 Active/Passive Cluster on SFP Ports</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2020-active-passive-cluster-on-sfp-ports/m-p/22925#M16716</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Mikand,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thnaks for the answer. I aggree that recomended is to use dedicated HA ports for Clustering, but as I said I am running 2020 PA ,which does not have a dedicated ports for HA, so I have to use any ports for HA(HA1&amp;amp; HA2). But I also have a contraints of distance between the two PA as they are placed in two different buildings. so the only choice will be to use the fiber for HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2020-active-passive-cluster-on-sfp-ports/m-p/22925#M16716</guid>
      <dc:creator>itsecll</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-31T04:58:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2020 Active/Passive Cluster on SFP Ports</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2020-active-passive-cluster-on-sfp-ports/m-p/22926#M16717</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ahh yes if your box doesnt have any dedicated HA interfaces then your only option is to use the dataplance interfaces and in this case I would go for a sfp so the fiber is directly attached to the PAN unit (instead of an external fiberconverter).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2020-active-passive-cluster-on-sfp-ports/m-p/22926#M16717</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-31T07:13:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

