<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23763#M17320</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A linknet is what you call the small network (usually /30 or /29 if using redundancy) setup between two layer3 (routing) devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This linknet is to be able to setup nexthop addresses in each device routingtable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example... lets assume you (for some odd reason) have 10.0.0.0/16 as client network (10.0.0.0 -&amp;gt; 10.0.255.255) which means 65534 mac addresses which the device which will be default gateway for all those must be able to handle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However your PA can only do 1000 mac address per interface (or how large the limit now is).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So to fix this (except for doing a better segmentation than having 65k clients on the same layer2 network &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_big_eyes:"&gt;😃&lt;/span&gt; is to plugin a L3 device which can handle that many mac address on a single interface and then setup a linknet towards the PA device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the result will be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PA &amp;lt;{192.168.0.0/30]&amp;gt; L3 device [10.0.0.0/16]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the PA have 192.168.0.1 and the L3 device have 192.168.0.2 then the routing table in the L3 device will be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 nexthop 192.168.0.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When looking in the PA you will see all the 10.0.0.0 -&amp;gt; 10.0.255.255 clients when looking at srcip, but when looking at mac address there will be only one - the mac address for 192.168.0.2 (the mac address of the L3 device).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PA must of course have a returning route like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 10.0.0.0/16 nexthop 192.168.0.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:18:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-19T20:18:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23755#M17312</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi PAN,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When is that the PA-500 will have an ARP cache limit of 1000?&amp;nbsp; I was promised during the launch of version 4.1 that the ARP cache limit had been increased to 1000 from 500 just to realise that it never happened.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am desperately waiting for something on this as clients are not at all happy with this and having a work around just to avoid this is not an easy task specially when someone else does the installation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone from PAN give me some kind of a hope on this please.&amp;nbsp; It would be very great of you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:32:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23755#M17312</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalyanram.piratla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-07T17:32:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23756#M17313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess you already contacted your sales rep regarding this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A workaround should be to use a L3-switch in front of your PAN and setup a linknet between your PAN and the L3-switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Like so (just an example):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clients: 10.0.0.0/16 (shitload of clients :smileysilly:)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;L3-switch int gi0/1: 10.0.255.254/16 (interface towards the clients, this ip is the defgw for the clients)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;L3-switch int gi0/2: 192.168.0.1/30 (interface towards the PAN)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PAN int0: 192.168.0.2/30 (interface towards the L3-switch).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then routing in the L3-switch:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This way the PAN will only need to keep track of a single ARP entry (the mac-address for the L3-switch (192.168.0.1)) while your L3 switch will keep track (ARP-wise) of all the clients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:39:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23756#M17313</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-07T23:39:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23757#M17314</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi... Based on the example you've provided, can you please let me know on how to create a static route on the Palo Alto.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:18:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23757#M17314</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalyanram.piratla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-08T10:18:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23758#M17315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'll find your virtual router(s) under Network - Virtual Routers. In the VR config you can define static routes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:22:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23758#M17315</guid>
      <dc:creator>gafrol</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-08T19:22:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23759#M17316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know about configuring where and how to configure static routes on the Palo Alto.&amp;nbsp; But was just wondering what would be the static route in terms of Destination and Next hop value which would obviously be on the external interface of the PA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:23:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23759#M17316</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalyanram.piratla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-09T09:23:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23760#M17317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your clients have 10.0.0.0/16 and the L3-switch interface towards your PAN have ip 192.168.0.1 (your PAN have 192.168.0.2 at eth1/1 and the subnetmask for this linknet is /30 (255.255.255.252) then your routing in your PAN should be setup as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;ip&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;static-route&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;entry name="ROUTE_CLIENTS"&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;nexthop&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;ip-address&amp;gt;192.168.0.1&amp;lt;/ip-address&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;/nexthop&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;interface&amp;gt;ethernet1/1&amp;lt;/interface&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;metric&amp;gt;10&amp;lt;/metric&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;destination&amp;gt;10.0.0.0/16&amp;lt;/destination&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;/entry&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;/static-route&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;lt;/ip&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:51:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23760#M17317</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-09T09:51:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23761#M17318</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the information.&amp;nbsp; Will try it out when i get a chance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:08:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23761#M17318</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalyanram.piratla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-09T11:08:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23762#M17319</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do you mean a linknet?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23762#M17319</guid>
      <dc:creator>mstevenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-19T11:05:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23763#M17320</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A linknet is what you call the small network (usually /30 or /29 if using redundancy) setup between two layer3 (routing) devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This linknet is to be able to setup nexthop addresses in each device routingtable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example... lets assume you (for some odd reason) have 10.0.0.0/16 as client network (10.0.0.0 -&amp;gt; 10.0.255.255) which means 65534 mac addresses which the device which will be default gateway for all those must be able to handle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However your PA can only do 1000 mac address per interface (or how large the limit now is).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So to fix this (except for doing a better segmentation than having 65k clients on the same layer2 network &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_big_eyes:"&gt;😃&lt;/span&gt; is to plugin a L3 device which can handle that many mac address on a single interface and then setup a linknet towards the PA device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the result will be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PA &amp;lt;{192.168.0.0/30]&amp;gt; L3 device [10.0.0.0/16]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the PA have 192.168.0.1 and the L3 device have 192.168.0.2 then the routing table in the L3 device will be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 0.0.0.0/0 nexthop 192.168.0.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When looking in the PA you will see all the 10.0.0.0 -&amp;gt; 10.0.255.255 clients when looking at srcip, but when looking at mac address there will be only one - the mac address for 192.168.0.2 (the mac address of the L3 device).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PA must of course have a returning route like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip route 10.0.0.0/16 nexthop 192.168.0.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:18:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23763#M17320</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-19T20:18:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ARP Cache Limit on PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23764#M17321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version 5 will solve this issue... and I am glad.. &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/arp-cache-limit-on-pa-500/m-p/23764#M17321</guid>
      <dc:creator>kalyanram.piratla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-17T16:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

