<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 2050 running high dataplane CPU in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24169#M17621</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to tests performed by NSS Labs the PAN devices datasheets are underrated rather than overrated. One of the tests showed 115% performance of the stated throughput for a particular model (I think it was a box from the 4000 series).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First of all having a high "cpu usage" for the dataplane isnt a problem as long as the usage isnt at 100% which you will then notice will affect the latency and then throughput and stuff like that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which PANOS do you use and when was it you last rebooted the device?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course rebooting the device should only be necessary doing firmware updates but if there is something stalled which gets fixed by a reboot (but then returns after some time) you should contact your sales rep. to file a support case so some support engineer can bring you a list of commands to run to identify what goes wrong (in case there is a hardware malfunction or something else).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen reports in this forum that older versions of 4.1 might have had some issues but it seems that 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 solved those.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:50:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-07T22:50:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>2050 running high dataplane CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24168#M17620</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our PA-2050 is consistently running at 70-85% on the dataplane CPU despite running at 1/5 of the advertised maximum specs (40-40k sessions and 100-110mbps). I understand that the specs listed are best case scenario and don't expect to get close but I do expect better performance than what I am getting. It could be that our device is just wonky so I wanted to see if anyone else has seen this. We only have 10-12 security policies. No QoS, SSL Decrypt, etc. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24168#M17620</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lopes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-07T15:29:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2050 running high dataplane CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24169#M17621</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to tests performed by NSS Labs the PAN devices datasheets are underrated rather than overrated. One of the tests showed 115% performance of the stated throughput for a particular model (I think it was a box from the 4000 series).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First of all having a high "cpu usage" for the dataplane isnt a problem as long as the usage isnt at 100% which you will then notice will affect the latency and then throughput and stuff like that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which PANOS do you use and when was it you last rebooted the device?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course rebooting the device should only be necessary doing firmware updates but if there is something stalled which gets fixed by a reboot (but then returns after some time) you should contact your sales rep. to file a support case so some support engineer can bring you a list of commands to run to identify what goes wrong (in case there is a hardware malfunction or something else).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen reports in this forum that older versions of 4.1 might have had some issues but it seems that 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 solved those.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:50:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24169#M17621</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-07T22:50:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2050 running high dataplane CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24170#M17622</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My concern is that I am running high CPU on a device which should be capable of 5x's the performance I am seeing currently. There are several additional services I would like to utilize (QoS for example) and additional capacity that I would like to add however, I don't dare risk it seeing as the device is already running close to its limit. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regardless of how it tested out, I would never presume I could run a device at or close to 100%. This is asking for serious issues. We have already throttled back the capacity to maintain the current (high) utilization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It has been rebooted at least twice in the last couple weeks. It is running 4.1.2 currently however I saw the same utilization while on 4.0.7. We have 4.1.3 loaded but are waiting for a maintenance window to reboot the device following the patch. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24170#M17622</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lopes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-08T14:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2050 running high dataplane CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24171#M17623</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess you have already seen a similar case in this thread?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/message/11918#11918"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/message/11918#11918&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24171#M17623</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-08T23:03:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 2050 running high dataplane CPU</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24172#M17624</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had not. Thanks for pointing it out. There are some interesting correlations. There really wasn't a mention of a fix. It sounded more like they just cranked it up and it has been able to handle the additional load. However it would be interesting to see how it faired with 1M+ sessions. That would be about half the advertised max (session wise). They were getting ~7700 session/CPU% at 600k but that would max the device out at 770k sessions unless greater efficiency was realized.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another interesting correlation is that we have been seeing sporadic high management plane CPU as well (hitting 100% several times) as they have. I am going to lower some of our logging levels and see what happens. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you know if the dataplane CPU $ that is displayed on the dashboard is the same as is displayed in the CLI when you do "show running resource-monitor"? I have started to monitor that as I have been told it is a true indicator of the dataplane CPU usage. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will be patching to 4.1.3 tonight so maybe that will help. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 23:21:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/2050-running-high-dataplane-cpu/m-p/24172#M17624</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lopes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-08T23:21:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

