<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Vsystems With HA( Active/Passive) in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vsystems-with-ha-active-passive/m-p/24642#M17947</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VSys failover is done at the physical and not virtual level currently.&amp;nbsp; This means that any failure condition that you have configured or any system failure will result in a full physical swap of active and passive functions.&amp;nbsp; So if VSys1 fails - then the whole device fails over.&amp;nbsp; It is unlikely that a VSys will fail while others do not, except on a physical interface level.&amp;nbsp; if you have a 4,000 series Link Aggregation can help to mitigate this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All sessions for all VSys are synchronised all of the time using a dedicated HA link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;James&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-15T09:06:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Vsystems With HA( Active/Passive)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vsystems-with-ha-active-passive/m-p/24641#M17946</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question :&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please refer the attached Diagram.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt;
&lt;style&gt;
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-priority:99;
	mso-style-qformat:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0in;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
&lt;/style&gt;
&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; font: 7pt &amp;amp;quot; font-family: Symbol; "&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If the Vsys1.1 fails what will happen to the firewall 1? What will happen to Vsys2.1, Vsys3.1 &lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;(will they remain active or will they go passive as well.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;How will be the session synchronization between virtual firewalls (Eg- Vsys1.1 &amp;amp; Vsys1.2) and between the two physical firewalls? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Please some one help me in this regard. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vsystems-with-ha-active-passive/m-p/24641#M17946</guid>
      <dc:creator>roshithw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-15T06:54:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vsystems With HA( Active/Passive)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vsystems-with-ha-active-passive/m-p/24642#M17947</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VSys failover is done at the physical and not virtual level currently.&amp;nbsp; This means that any failure condition that you have configured or any system failure will result in a full physical swap of active and passive functions.&amp;nbsp; So if VSys1 fails - then the whole device fails over.&amp;nbsp; It is unlikely that a VSys will fail while others do not, except on a physical interface level.&amp;nbsp; if you have a 4,000 series Link Aggregation can help to mitigate this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All sessions for all VSys are synchronised all of the time using a dedicated HA link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;James&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vsystems-with-ha-active-passive/m-p/24642#M17947</guid>
      <dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-15T09:06:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vsystems With HA( Active/Passive)</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vsystems-with-ha-active-passive/m-p/24643#M17948</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you alot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:51:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/vsystems-with-ha-active-passive/m-p/24643#M17948</guid>
      <dc:creator>roshithw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-15T09:51:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

