<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Combination Signatiure in Custome Vulnerablity Signature in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-signatiure-in-custome-vulnerablity-signature/m-p/27581#M20105</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the late reply. Let me run some tests in the lab and get back to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Renato&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:44:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gswcowboy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-16T23:44:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Combination Signatiure in Custome Vulnerablity Signature</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-signatiure-in-custome-vulnerablity-signature/m-p/27580#M20104</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; when I create new ﻿combination Vulnerablity Signatures ( for examples create new threat ID 48888 inlcude ﻿threat ID 40000 or 40001 )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) I am not sure if ID=40000 attack happend , if threat log both have two log are ID=48888 &amp;amp; ID=40000 log , or which one of them ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) if I put the ID=48888 in Vulnerablity Exception list , when ID=4000 attack happend , if threat log still have ID=4000 log or not ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-signatiure-in-custome-vulnerablity-signature/m-p/27580#M20104</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffJin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-15T02:26:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combination Signatiure in Custome Vulnerablity Signature</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-signatiure-in-custome-vulnerablity-signature/m-p/27581#M20105</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the late reply. Let me run some tests in the lab and get back to you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Renato&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:44:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-signatiure-in-custome-vulnerablity-signature/m-p/27581#M20105</guid>
      <dc:creator>gswcowboy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-16T23:44:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

