<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PanOS 6.1.0 and Bash in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-6-1-0-and-bash/m-p/27835#M20292</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks HULK.&amp;nbsp; We have 6.0.5 I think on our soon to be production units.&amp;nbsp; I have some limited deployment units, as in not hub/datacenter out there that I went ahead to 6.1.0.&amp;nbsp; I really like the updates in 6.1.0 plus we were seeing some disk usage alerts that were fixed with 6.1.0 and not 6.0.5.&amp;nbsp; I think I'm going to stick with 6.1.0 for my non-hub units as we move through deployment and then go to 6.1.1 or whatever comes next.&amp;nbsp; Based on the OS deployment rollout it seems like we should see that sometime this month or so which works for my remote sites, but not my hubs.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dusk2dusk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-11-06T17:52:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PanOS 6.1.0 and Bash</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-6-1-0-and-bash/m-p/27833#M20290</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see what might be conflicting claims regarding Bash and its full remediation in 6.1.0.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here I see that 6.1.0 is still vulnerable to bash based on the claims&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://securityadvisories.paloaltonetworks.com/" title="https://securityadvisories.paloaltonetworks.com/"&gt;Palo Alto Networks Product Vulnerability - Security Advisories&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, here I see that at least &lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;CVE-2014-7169 is claimed to be remediated.&amp;nbsp; I'm hoping that means CVE-2014-6271 is no longer an issue either because it is A. older and B. 7169 was announced because fixes for 6271 were not a full solution for the complete Bash vulnerability.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-8243"&gt;PAN-OS 6.1.0: Addressed Issues&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have major deployments going on with Palo Alto firewalls and I don't want to go through with 6.1.0 unless it fully addresses the issue, especially if 6.1.1 is coming down the line and I will have to update to that version ASAP anyway.&amp;nbsp; There will always be new bugs and reasons to update firmware but as we are at a major deployment point, I want to get mandatory reboots out of the way prior to full deployment.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-6-1-0-and-bash/m-p/27833#M20290</guid>
      <dc:creator>dusk2dusk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-06T16:52:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PanOS 6.1.0 and Bash</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-6-1-0-and-bash/m-p/27834#M20291</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="jiveTT-hover-user jive-username-link" data-avatarid="1229" data-externalid="" data-presence="null" data-userid="29965" data-username="dusk2dusk" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/people/dusk2dusk" style="padding: 0 3px 0 0; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 1.1em; font-family: inherit; color: #006595;"&gt;dusk2dusk&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt; ,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PAN already have a signature to protect &lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;CVE-2014-6271 &amp;amp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;2014-&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;7169&lt;/SPAN&gt;, the signature has been delivered with app-database version 467. Also PAN OS 6.0.6 and 6.1.0 is having a new RPM to to comply the same. Since, PAN OS 6.1.0 has been released few days back, and we don't have much feedback on this. I would personally suggest you to use a stable 6.0.x release for your production device.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H2&gt;&lt;/H2&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:10:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-6-1-0-and-bash/m-p/27834#M20291</guid>
      <dc:creator>HULK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-06T17:10:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PanOS 6.1.0 and Bash</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-6-1-0-and-bash/m-p/27835#M20292</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks HULK.&amp;nbsp; We have 6.0.5 I think on our soon to be production units.&amp;nbsp; I have some limited deployment units, as in not hub/datacenter out there that I went ahead to 6.1.0.&amp;nbsp; I really like the updates in 6.1.0 plus we were seeing some disk usage alerts that were fixed with 6.1.0 and not 6.0.5.&amp;nbsp; I think I'm going to stick with 6.1.0 for my non-hub units as we move through deployment and then go to 6.1.1 or whatever comes next.&amp;nbsp; Based on the OS deployment rollout it seems like we should see that sometime this month or so which works for my remote sites, but not my hubs.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panos-6-1-0-and-bash/m-p/27835#M20292</guid>
      <dc:creator>dusk2dusk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-06T17:52:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

