<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WAN Failover NAT issue in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27877#M20327</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure.&amp;nbsp; I basically set it up just like the document stated unless I missed something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="natissue.png" class="image-0 jive-image" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/legacyfs/online/13923_natissue.png" style="height: 87px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:29:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ClintL</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-06-13T17:29:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WAN Failover NAT issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27875#M20325</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to set up WAN failover on a Palo Alto PA-3020.&amp;nbsp; I used the document at the bottom of this post.&amp;nbsp; When I unplug the interface that is set up in the PBR, it switches over to the secondary ISP like it is supposed to.&amp;nbsp; The problem is the Primary-NAT policy is still active so traffic doesn't pass because the Backup-NAT never takes effect.&amp;nbsp; If I manually disable the Primary-NAT rule then I see traffic able to leave the Palo Alto.&amp;nbsp; I noticed the document is for PANOS 3.1 but it doesn't look like much has changed as far as settings go.&amp;nbsp; Does this setup still work for 6.0+?&amp;nbsp; If so is there something I am missing so the Backup-NAT rule takes over?&amp;nbsp; I didn't see anywhere that tells the NAT policies themselves to failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="wanfailoverissue.png" class="image-0 jive-image" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/legacyfs/online/13922_wanfailoverissue.png" style="height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1357"&gt;Dual ISP Branch Office Configuration&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27875#M20325</guid>
      <dc:creator>ClintL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-13T17:21:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAN Failover NAT issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27876#M20326</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;could you please share your nat rules here &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:25:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27876#M20326</guid>
      <dc:creator>Retired Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-13T17:25:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAN Failover NAT issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27877#M20327</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure.&amp;nbsp; I basically set it up just like the document stated unless I missed something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="natissue.png" class="image-0 jive-image" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/legacyfs/online/13923_natissue.png" style="height: 87px; width: 620px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:29:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27877#M20327</guid>
      <dc:creator>ClintL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-13T17:29:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAN Failover NAT issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27878#M20328</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you have to choose destination interface on Nat rules&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is because you hit always first rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:31:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27878#M20328</guid>
      <dc:creator>Retired Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-13T17:31:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WAN Failover NAT issue</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27879#M20329</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That was it.&amp;nbsp; Yeah I just missed that part in the document.&amp;nbsp; Works like a charm now.&amp;nbsp; Thanks panos!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:39:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/wan-failover-nat-issue/m-p/27879#M20329</guid>
      <dc:creator>ClintL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-13T17:39:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

