<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: OSPF A/P HA Config with Floating Static Routes in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-a-p-ha-config-with-floating-static-routes/m-p/2801#M2085</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should not have to add the routes to the firewall since the forwarding table is synchronized between the units in an Active/Passive cluster.&amp;nbsp; I think these will not show in the routing table, but they should show up in the forwarding table on the Passive device (show routing fib).&amp;nbsp; If the routes are not showing up there it might be good to open a support case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, making sure the Passive Link State setting is "Auto" will keep the link up so that can save some time, too.&amp;nbsp; You might also try reducing some of the hold timers to see if it makes a difference, but it is usually best to keep those to default, if possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kelly&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:32:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kbrazil</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-03T07:32:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>OSPF A/P HA Config with Floating Static Routes</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-a-p-ha-config-with-floating-static-routes/m-p/2800#M2084</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to understand the sample OSPF Active/Passive HA configuration outlined in Tech Note: How to Configure OSPF&amp;nbsp; &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1939"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1939&lt;/A&gt; .&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The problem I have is with the floating static routes defined on upstream and downstream routers intended to reduce failover times.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Floating static routes are described in steps 12 through 14 in the Tech Guide.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In my small test network I have a session delay of 4 seconds (measured by continuous pings across the network) during a failover.&amp;nbsp; I believe my delay is actually OSPF convergence time.&amp;nbsp; Failover delay is shorter.&amp;nbsp; I don't think the floating static routes are helping to reduce delay.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While OSPF is still converging I can see the static routes on the upstream router and on the downstream router.&amp;nbsp; However, they do not appear on the Palo Alto firewalls.&amp;nbsp; Until OSPF converges, only connected routes appear in the firewall routing table.&amp;nbsp; Since OSPF is momentarily unavailable and redistributed routes are gone, it seems that I would have to define static routes with a high administrative cost pointing in the appropriate directions on the Palo Alto firewall cluster as well as on the upstream and downstream routers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I appreciate comments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ingThanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:09:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-a-p-ha-config-with-floating-static-routes/m-p/2800#M2084</guid>
      <dc:creator>oshcomp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-28T22:09:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OSPF A/P HA Config with Floating Static Routes</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-a-p-ha-config-with-floating-static-routes/m-p/2801#M2085</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should not have to add the routes to the firewall since the forwarding table is synchronized between the units in an Active/Passive cluster.&amp;nbsp; I think these will not show in the routing table, but they should show up in the forwarding table on the Passive device (show routing fib).&amp;nbsp; If the routes are not showing up there it might be good to open a support case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, making sure the Passive Link State setting is "Auto" will keep the link up so that can save some time, too.&amp;nbsp; You might also try reducing some of the hold timers to see if it makes a difference, but it is usually best to keep those to default, if possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kelly&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:32:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ospf-a-p-ha-config-with-floating-static-routes/m-p/2801#M2085</guid>
      <dc:creator>kbrazil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-03T07:32:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

