<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is it risky to that allow browser-based apps on any ports in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-risky-to-that-allow-browser-based-apps-on-any-ports/m-p/28745#M20980</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm considering to create a policy for Internet access to replace traditional Internet rule (i.e. outbound 80/tcp or any other ports raised by user per special request).&amp;nbsp; To minimize future special request by user, I prefer to allow any ports if app-id identified the traffic as "browser-based apps".&amp;nbsp; Would it be too risky to enable such rule (provided that antivirus, antispyware and vulnerability protection profiles are all turned on with URL filtering)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>u7541</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-22T09:54:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it risky to that allow browser-based apps on any ports</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-risky-to-that-allow-browser-based-apps-on-any-ports/m-p/28745#M20980</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm considering to create a policy for Internet access to replace traditional Internet rule (i.e. outbound 80/tcp or any other ports raised by user per special request).&amp;nbsp; To minimize future special request by user, I prefer to allow any ports if app-id identified the traffic as "browser-based apps".&amp;nbsp; Would it be too risky to enable such rule (provided that antivirus, antispyware and vulnerability protection profiles are all turned on with URL filtering)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-risky-to-that-allow-browser-based-apps-on-any-ports/m-p/28745#M20980</guid>
      <dc:creator>u7541</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-22T09:54:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it risky to that allow browser-based apps on any ports</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-risky-to-that-allow-browser-based-apps-on-any-ports/m-p/28746#M20981</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; There is no absolute good answer about this. Security mongers will scream about this heresy while bored admin will say 'who cares if no virus comes in?'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I opened broswer-based on 80,443,8080,8443,81 and it suits 99% of user needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-risky-to-that-allow-browser-based-apps-on-any-ports/m-p/28746#M20981</guid>
      <dc:creator>lardsa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-22T11:37:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

