<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Layer-3 Active/Active mode with ARP load-sharing in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-3-active-active-mode-with-arp-load-sharing/m-p/29024#M21222</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just wondering, if I'm using layer-3 sub-interfaces in active/active mode, is it possible to create ARP load-sharing for each sub-interface on both PA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by EX: sub-interface 1.102 with IP address 192.168.102.2 on PA-1 and 192.168.102.3 on PA-2&amp;nbsp; ARP IP 192.168.102.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sub-interface 1.110 with IP address 192.168.110.2 on PA-1 and 192.168.110.3 on PA-2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ARP IP 192.168.110.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is that possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maher&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 20:44:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>homicidedart</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-11T20:44:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Layer-3 Active/Active mode with ARP load-sharing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-3-active-active-mode-with-arp-load-sharing/m-p/29024#M21222</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just wondering, if I'm using layer-3 sub-interfaces in active/active mode, is it possible to create ARP load-sharing for each sub-interface on both PA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by EX: sub-interface 1.102 with IP address 192.168.102.2 on PA-1 and 192.168.102.3 on PA-2&amp;nbsp; ARP IP 192.168.102.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sub-interface 1.110 with IP address 192.168.110.2 on PA-1 and 192.168.110.3 on PA-2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ARP IP 192.168.110.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is that possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maher&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2014 20:44:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-3-active-active-mode-with-arp-load-sharing/m-p/29024#M21222</guid>
      <dc:creator>homicidedart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-11T20:44:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layer-3 Active/Active mode with ARP load-sharing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-3-active-active-mode-with-arp-load-sharing/m-p/29025#M21223</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Mehar,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ARP load sharing is only really effective with directly connected clients over L2. The basic recommendations are given below,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a. HA cluster is not deployed in a layer 3 sandwich&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b. No layer 3 separation between the hosts in the LAN and HA cluster. Since the HASH of the MAC address in the ARP request is used to for load sharing, a layer3 device between the hosts and cluster will defeat this purpose, because the HA c. The cluster will only see the MAC address of the router.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your clients are connected through those sub-interfaces within the same L-2 networks, then as per my understanding it should work. But, I never tried this&lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;SPAN class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark"&gt;&amp;nbsp; .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 04:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-3-active-active-mode-with-arp-load-sharing/m-p/29025#M21223</guid>
      <dc:creator>HULK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-12T04:59:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layer-3 Active/Active mode with ARP load-sharing</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-3-active-active-mode-with-arp-load-sharing/m-p/29026#M21224</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, arp load sharing configuration is possible in Active/Active clusters.&amp;nbsp; See DOC-2541 on page 18 and following for the configuration example.&amp;nbsp; This was released for PanOS 4.&amp;nbsp; I can't find an updated version, but this should still work as designed with the newer releases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-2541"&gt;Configuring Active/Active HA PAN-OS 4.0&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 01:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/layer-3-active-active-mode-with-arp-load-sharing/m-p/29026#M21224</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-13T01:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

