<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is there a way to limit the number of logged in administrators? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-there-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-logged-in-administrators/m-p/29030#M21228</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A maximum number of logged in users would be a good feature.&amp;nbsp; Let me know if you have a Feature Request number for this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 22:27:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-03T22:27:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is there a way to limit the number of logged in administrators?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-there-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-logged-in-administrators/m-p/29027#M21225</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This came up as a question during a class and to my knowledge there is not a way to limit the number of logged in administrators, however the student asking presented a reasonable case;&amp;nbsp; In a service provider or large enterprise environment during a network event multiple administrators log into the firewall and begin looking at filtered logs.&amp;nbsp; Once more than about three get logged in the performance of the MP becomes significant enough to impede those administrators as they search for interesting log events. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My initial recommendation is to have the logs pointed at a log collection tool, and have the administrators use that tool for the filtered views.&amp;nbsp; Is that the only way to manage this type of load?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-there-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-logged-in-administrators/m-p/29027#M21225</guid>
      <dc:creator>gelgin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T14:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a way to limit the number of logged in administrators?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-there-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-logged-in-administrators/m-p/29028#M21226</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/u1/12718"&gt;gelgin&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as the firewall is concerned, the management plane would definitely take heavy toll if there are multiple administrators filtering traffic logs at the same time.&amp;nbsp; In order to cope up with Service providers and Enterprise level environments, we have a central managing system (virtualized or hardware based) called 'Panorama' where is specially dedicated for logging and reporting purposes. Its a central management system that manages several firewall together and can be ready in situations like yours. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;More on Panorama:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-6590"&gt;Panorama Administrator's Guide 6.0 (English)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-4173"&gt;Panorama Design Planning&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If Panorama is not an option, you can enable syslogging on the firewall and certainly leverage third party vendors like SPLUNK and SPICEWORKS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kunal Adak&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:28:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-there-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-logged-in-administrators/m-p/29028#M21226</guid>
      <dc:creator>kadak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T16:28:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a way to limit the number of logged in administrators?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-there-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-logged-in-administrators/m-p/29029#M21227</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;And thats what I thought... I pointed him in those directions as well... Maybe its worth a feature request for environments that may have operational constraints that demand the use of the firewall vs. an offline approach?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 16:54:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-there-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-logged-in-administrators/m-p/29029#M21227</guid>
      <dc:creator>gelgin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T16:54:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there a way to limit the number of logged in administrators?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-there-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-logged-in-administrators/m-p/29030#M21228</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A maximum number of logged in users would be a good feature.&amp;nbsp; Let me know if you have a Feature Request number for this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 22:27:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-there-a-way-to-limit-the-number-of-logged-in-administrators/m-p/29030#M21228</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-03T22:27:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

