<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LACP LAG in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-lag/m-p/30343#M22191</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;no LACP support, only static etherchannel, pay attention in the design phase, maybe LACP is not needed in your case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For A/P HA configuration I suggest starting with&amp;nbsp; &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-2561"&gt;validate design&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 08:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NGS_SOC</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-08T08:21:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LACP LAG</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-lag/m-p/30341#M22189</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody know how to setup LACP lag on PA 5000 ver 5.04. SInce I am configuring active passive configuration and I have two core switches. I want core 1 to be my primary link and my secondary core as my secondary link from single firewall. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 21:03:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-lag/m-p/30341#M22189</guid>
      <dc:creator>knesan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-07T21:03:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LACP LAG</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-lag/m-p/30342#M22190</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PA does not support LACP at this point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI: &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-3594"&gt;Which Link Aggregation Protocols are Supported?&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-lag/m-p/30342#M22190</guid>
      <dc:creator>emr_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-08T00:07:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LACP LAG</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-lag/m-p/30343#M22191</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;no LACP support, only static etherchannel, pay attention in the design phase, maybe LACP is not needed in your case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For A/P HA configuration I suggest starting with&amp;nbsp; &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-2561"&gt;validate design&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 08:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/lacp-lag/m-p/30343#M22191</guid>
      <dc:creator>NGS_SOC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-08T08:21:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

