<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is it possible that traffics go on each other sub-interfaces with same physical interface? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30392#M22225</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think it is possible to work because sub-interfaces are different interface logically with tag number. &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:22:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Retired Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-22T10:22:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it possible that traffics go on each other sub-interfaces with same physical interface?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30391#M22224</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to make the following network-diagram. Is it possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A Cisco Nexus&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Paloalto&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VRF-1 ----------------------&amp;gt; eth1/1.1 | 1.1.1.1 | VR : default | trust&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tag 10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; |&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; |&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VRF-2 &amp;lt;--------------------- eth1/1.2 | 2.2.1.1 | VR : default | untrust&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tag 20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;1. Traffics go into sub-interface eth1/1.1 with tag 10.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;2. FW process routing and policing.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;3. Traffics go out from sub-interface eth1/1.2 with tag 20.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;Two sub-interfaces are on same physical interface.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;KC Lee&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:14:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30391#M22224</guid>
      <dc:creator>KiCheon.Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T10:14:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that traffics go on each other sub-interfaces with same physical interface?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30392#M22225</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think it is possible to work because sub-interfaces are different interface logically with tag number. &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:22:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30392#M22225</guid>
      <dc:creator>Retired Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T10:22:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that traffics go on each other sub-interfaces with same physical interface?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30393#M22226</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Cheon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes this is possible. You have to make sure the following are in place:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Layer3 subinterface eth1/1.1 configured for tag 10 , zone-x, ip-1.1.1.1/netmask&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Layer3 subinterface eth1/1.2 configured for tag 20 , zone-y, ip-2.2.1.1/netmask&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Security rules allowing traffic between zone x and y as required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-optional-any other policies like nat etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dileep&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:31:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30393#M22226</guid>
      <dc:creator>dreputi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T13:31:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that traffics go on each other sub-interfaces with same physical interface?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30394#M22227</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Cheon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its very much possible, too many customer has this implementation. Good thing is you dont have to configure any special routing because both the interfaces on PANW are on same VR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer following document on sub-interfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1805"&gt;How to Create Tagged Sub-Interfaces&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardik Shah&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30394#M22227</guid>
      <dc:creator>hshah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T14:47:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that traffics go on each other sub-interfaces with same physical interface?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30395#M22228</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also you can read &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1618"&gt;Securing Inter VLAN Traffic&lt;/A&gt; for further information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30395#M22228</guid>
      <dc:creator>Retired Member</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T17:22:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible that traffics go on each other sub-interfaces with same physical interface?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30396#M22229</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wow~.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much~ Roh, dreputi, hshah, panos.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My worry is broken by you and get good energy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 01:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-it-possible-that-traffics-go-on-each-other-sub-interfaces/m-p/30396#M22229</guid>
      <dc:creator>KiCheon.Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-23T01:59:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

