<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is Captive Portal triggered when using &amp;quot;any&amp;quot; as user in security policy? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-captive-portal-triggered-when-using-quot-any-quot-as-user-in/m-p/3022#M2249</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you have no IP to user mapping for a particular IP address, for traffic that comes in on a zone that has User Identification enabled, AND a CP policy is enabled, then the CP page should be triggered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When looking at the Security policy, you are trying to restrict traffic for only "Known" users - whether they known via the User ID agent, or CP, or GP, the security policy will control what traffic is allowed for what users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you choose to put "unknown" or "any" - that would imply that you do not really care about "known" users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The security policy is more for controlling who gets what access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To trigger the CP policy, you ought to look at the CP policy and the zones and addresses for which you'd like the CP policy triggered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sjamaluddin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-26T07:19:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is Captive Portal triggered when using "any" as user in security policy?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-captive-portal-triggered-when-using-quot-any-quot-as-user-in/m-p/3020#M2247</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read a lot of captive portal set up. In almost every documents says that the user "unknown" doesn't trigger the captive portal. I think that the "any" user also included the "unknown" user, I'm not quite sure if those rules are gonna trigger the captive portal policy [And I don't want to]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-captive-portal-triggered-when-using-quot-any-quot-as-user-in/m-p/3020#M2247</guid>
      <dc:creator>GLastra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-21T22:30:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Captive Portal triggered when using "any" as user in security policy?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-captive-portal-triggered-when-using-quot-any-quot-as-user-in/m-p/3021#M2248</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I have tested this in the lab and it does trigger Captive Portal when using "any" as user in security policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have security rule with user as "Unknown" it will work fine, and triggers captive portal login page..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have security rule with user as "any" it will work fine. and triggers captive portal login page&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have security rule with user as "Known-user" it will not work because captive portal is only for unknown users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To learn more about captive portal here is a link:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/docs/DOC-1159"&gt;How to Configure Captive Portal&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if you have any questions.'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dileep&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 08:24:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-captive-portal-triggered-when-using-quot-any-quot-as-user-in/m-p/3021#M2248</guid>
      <dc:creator>dreputi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-22T08:24:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Captive Portal triggered when using "any" as user in security policy?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-captive-portal-triggered-when-using-quot-any-quot-as-user-in/m-p/3022#M2249</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you have no IP to user mapping for a particular IP address, for traffic that comes in on a zone that has User Identification enabled, AND a CP policy is enabled, then the CP page should be triggered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When looking at the Security policy, you are trying to restrict traffic for only "Known" users - whether they known via the User ID agent, or CP, or GP, the security policy will control what traffic is allowed for what users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you choose to put "unknown" or "any" - that would imply that you do not really care about "known" users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The security policy is more for controlling who gets what access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To trigger the CP policy, you ought to look at the CP policy and the zones and addresses for which you'd like the CP policy triggered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/is-captive-portal-triggered-when-using-quot-any-quot-as-user-in/m-p/3022#M2249</guid>
      <dc:creator>sjamaluddin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-26T07:19:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

