<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PA 2050 Port forwarding question in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2050-port-forwarding-question/m-p/30732#M22500</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm new to the PA 2050.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to determine the best way of forwarding multiple incoming services on multiple external addresses to multiple internal servers. My PA 2050 is set up in L3 configuration. I have NAT policy rules for all my external-&amp;gt;internal address pairs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My delimma: I have several internal SMTP/FTP/WEB servers behind my 2050, listening on several external addresses. It appears I can NAT each service as a separate NAT policy rule, OR, I can leave the 1 to 1 NAT rule and create a security policy for incoming traffic from "untrust" -&amp;gt; "trust", "any" source address, and select the destination server and application/service to forward the traffic on to. Or can I? Is one more efficient and/or flexible than the other?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;David Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:24:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>david_scott</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-18T21:24:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA 2050 Port forwarding question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2050-port-forwarding-question/m-p/30732#M22500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm new to the PA 2050.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to determine the best way of forwarding multiple incoming services on multiple external addresses to multiple internal servers. My PA 2050 is set up in L3 configuration. I have NAT policy rules for all my external-&amp;gt;internal address pairs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My delimma: I have several internal SMTP/FTP/WEB servers behind my 2050, listening on several external addresses. It appears I can NAT each service as a separate NAT policy rule, OR, I can leave the 1 to 1 NAT rule and create a security policy for incoming traffic from "untrust" -&amp;gt; "trust", "any" source address, and select the destination server and application/service to forward the traffic on to. Or can I? Is one more efficient and/or flexible than the other?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;David Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:24:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2050-port-forwarding-question/m-p/30732#M22500</guid>
      <dc:creator>david_scott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-18T21:24:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2050 Port forwarding question</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2050-port-forwarding-question/m-p/30733#M22501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, both are viable solutions. It would be more efficient to have the single NAT rule and configure the app/service int the Security rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-2050-port-forwarding-question/m-p/30733#M22501</guid>
      <dc:creator>ggutierrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-25T14:18:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

