<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Link Aggregation to Cisco Switch in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-aggregation-to-cisco-switch/m-p/34844#M25565</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;How would I go about creating a link aggregation from a Cisco Cat4500-series switch to a PA-5020?&amp;nbsp; I'm shooting for having multiple links between the two devices for redundancy (and load-balancing too, if possible).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;What would I have to do on the Cisco side of the aggregated link?&amp;nbsp; What about the PA-5020 side of the link?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PSC_IT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-02T19:01:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Link Aggregation to Cisco Switch</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-aggregation-to-cisco-switch/m-p/34844#M25565</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;How would I go about creating a link aggregation from a Cisco Cat4500-series switch to a PA-5020?&amp;nbsp; I'm shooting for having multiple links between the two devices for redundancy (and load-balancing too, if possible).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt;"&gt;What would I have to do on the Cisco side of the aggregated link?&amp;nbsp; What about the PA-5020 side of the link?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-aggregation-to-cisco-switch/m-p/34844#M25565</guid>
      <dc:creator>PSC_IT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-02T19:01:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Aggregation to Cisco Switch</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-aggregation-to-cisco-switch/m-p/34845#M25566</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would configure the interfaces on the Cisco in an Cisco EtherChannel group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a great article on that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/04/configuring-link-aggregation-with-etherchannel/"&gt;http://www.ciscozine.com/2008/11/04/configuring-link-aggregation-with-etherchannel/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Next you would set up the corresponding interfaces on the Palo as a Aggregate Interface Group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The details on how to do that can be found on page 98 &amp;amp; 99 of the &lt;STRONG&gt;PA-4.1_Administrators_Guide.pdf&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco best practice is to use an even number of interfaces... ei: 2 or 4 or 6 or 8 1000Mbps ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have SmartNet support on the Cat4500, Cisco TAC should be able to help you set it up no problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 18:41:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/link-aggregation-to-cisco-switch/m-p/34845#M25566</guid>
      <dc:creator>panman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-03T18:41:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

