<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PBF in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf/m-p/35214#M25866</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the impact on firewall if we use only pbf instead of routing. how cpu intensive it can be? Is it a better option than routing, as in routing we are using fib table in the dataplane.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 07:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Westcon2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-28T07:11:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PBF</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf/m-p/35214#M25866</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the impact on firewall if we use only pbf instead of routing. how cpu intensive it can be? Is it a better option than routing, as in routing we are using fib table in the dataplane.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 07:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf/m-p/35214#M25866</guid>
      <dc:creator>Westcon2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-28T07:11:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBF</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf/m-p/35215#M25867</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;CPU usage is not a reason to use one method or the other, these are chosen based on the network topology design and needs for the site.&amp;nbsp; With all the processing that happens on the PA firewall routing is among the least stressful for the system.&amp;nbsp; Those that are intensive have custom silicon to assist in the processing tasks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:26:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf/m-p/35215#M25867</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-28T13:26:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBF</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf/m-p/35216#M25868</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any particular reasons that we would want to use Policy Based Forwarding only, instead of just routing the traffic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As Steven mentioned above, it really depends on your needs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 23:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf/m-p/35216#M25868</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmmccorkle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-29T23:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PBF</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf/m-p/35217#M25869</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Personally, I like to solve routing problems with virtual routers first.&amp;nbsp; This just keeps systems simpler and allows routing distribution and virtual router separation to work as intended and designed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For me PBR kicks in when you have edge cases that cannot be easily solved with virtual routers and route distribution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 14:09:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pbf/m-p/35217#M25869</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T14:09:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

