<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using local user database in security rules. in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-local-user-database-in-security-rules/m-p/35872#M26365</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know about the issues of using local user groups in these security rules. I have tried to use them but with no success. Because I did not have a specific requirement for this, i did not go further, but I know that they may not work correctly. &lt;BR /&gt;Defining the users one-by-one will work, but I think that they need to be also placed to the "additional users" field one by one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;George&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ggoudr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-29T12:56:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using local user database in security rules.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-local-user-database-in-security-rules/m-p/35869#M26362</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can a user defined in the local user database to be used on security policies?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What we need to deploy is that when a user authenticates via SSL VPN (using the local user database) to be able to apply security policies based on this specific username.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;George Goundras&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:51:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-local-user-database-in-security-rules/m-p/35869#M26362</guid>
      <dc:creator>ggoudr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-22T08:51:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using local user database in security rules.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-local-user-database-in-security-rules/m-p/35870#M26363</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;removing my last response as it was intended for a different thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The correct response for this thread is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you can use firewall in the manner you describe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SSL VPN users in the local database on the firewall can be used for the "users" field in security policies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:24:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-local-user-database-in-security-rules/m-p/35870#M26363</guid>
      <dc:creator>bpappas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-23T18:24:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using local user database in security rules.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-local-user-database-in-security-rules/m-p/35871#M26364</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've run into issues with using local groups in PA rules.&amp;nbsp; Individual local users work fine, but when trying to use locally defined groups, I've run into problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll try to open a case with support to get it checked out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tariq&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:26:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-local-user-database-in-security-rules/m-p/35871#M26364</guid>
      <dc:creator>rahmant</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-23T20:26:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using local user database in security rules.</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-local-user-database-in-security-rules/m-p/35872#M26365</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know about the issues of using local user groups in these security rules. I have tried to use them but with no success. Because I did not have a specific requirement for this, i did not go further, but I know that they may not work correctly. &lt;BR /&gt;Defining the users one-by-one will work, but I think that they need to be also placed to the "additional users" field one by one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;George&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/using-local-user-database-in-security-rules/m-p/35872#M26365</guid>
      <dc:creator>ggoudr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-29T12:56:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

