<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: no-pbf action rule not matching traffic in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/no-pbf-action-rule-not-matching-traffic/m-p/36881#M27081</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P class="MsoNormal"&gt;Good Morning,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="MsoNormal"&gt;For each PBF forward we will increment a counter and for each discard also log and increment. &lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun:yes"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;A no-PBF will result in a route based action and we do not increment a counter for this.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun:yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;The inclusion or exclusion of any logging or counters is typically made based on the cost of that feature vs. the value it adds in reporting and troubleshooting. &lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun:yes"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;This counter was omitted based on these variables and the feeling was that the cost outweighed the benefit. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pkruse</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-28T17:07:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>no-pbf action rule not matching traffic</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/no-pbf-action-rule-not-matching-traffic/m-p/36880#M27080</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #003366;"&gt;Hello,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #003366;"&gt;After creating some PBF rules, I'm checking out if there's some traffic matching or not. I realize that PBF regular rules, are SHOWING matches. But the PBF with no-pbf action rules are not showing matches. I believe that the action is working but the counter is not working properly. Do you know the expected behavior?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #003366;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #003366;"&gt;By the other hand, If the previous question behavior is correct, then PBF rules use sequence number to match the rule as security rules?or use the most accurate rule as routing process to hit the rule?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #003366;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #003366;"&gt;PANOS 4.0.1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #003366;"&gt;Thank you,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #003366;"&gt;Robclav&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 07:45:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/no-pbf-action-rule-not-matching-traffic/m-p/36880#M27080</guid>
      <dc:creator>dept_tec_bcn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-25T07:45:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no-pbf action rule not matching traffic</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/no-pbf-action-rule-not-matching-traffic/m-p/36881#M27081</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P class="MsoNormal"&gt;Good Morning,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="MsoNormal"&gt;For each PBF forward we will increment a counter and for each discard also log and increment. &lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun:yes"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;A no-PBF will result in a route based action and we do not increment a counter for this.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun:yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;The inclusion or exclusion of any logging or counters is typically made based on the cost of that feature vs. the value it adds in reporting and troubleshooting. &lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun:yes"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;This counter was omitted based on these variables and the feeling was that the cost outweighed the benefit. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:07:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/no-pbf-action-rule-not-matching-traffic/m-p/36881#M27081</guid>
      <dc:creator>pkruse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-28T17:07:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

