<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Global Protect 2-factor Auth &amp; User-ID Mapping in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-2-factor-auth-user-id-mapping/m-p/37266#M27336</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm migrating from ASA to Palo Alto including user VPN access (AnyConnect).&amp;nbsp; The setup will be 2 factor authentication with LDAP/Kerberos (not sure which yet) for the portal and OTP via RADIUS for the gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current setup allows access lists to be applied via the vpn policy to each authenticated user group limiting their access to internal resources.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My thought is to be able to build security policies providing these same limits that are based on the appropriate AD group.&amp;nbsp; This would allow me to have a single GP gateway &amp;amp; pool but still provide the same granularity they have now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is, does the user's AD username passthrough from the portal and mapped to their users GP IP even with RADIUS being used on the gateway?&amp;nbsp; I'm trying to avoid having to setup separate gateways with separate IP pools and having to base my security policies on the GP IP pools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking for best practices way of configuring this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any suggestions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 03:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CafNetMatt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-04-17T03:23:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Global Protect 2-factor Auth &amp; User-ID Mapping</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-2-factor-auth-user-id-mapping/m-p/37266#M27336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm migrating from ASA to Palo Alto including user VPN access (AnyConnect).&amp;nbsp; The setup will be 2 factor authentication with LDAP/Kerberos (not sure which yet) for the portal and OTP via RADIUS for the gateway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current setup allows access lists to be applied via the vpn policy to each authenticated user group limiting their access to internal resources.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My thought is to be able to build security policies providing these same limits that are based on the appropriate AD group.&amp;nbsp; This would allow me to have a single GP gateway &amp;amp; pool but still provide the same granularity they have now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is, does the user's AD username passthrough from the portal and mapped to their users GP IP even with RADIUS being used on the gateway?&amp;nbsp; I'm trying to avoid having to setup separate gateways with separate IP pools and having to base my security policies on the GP IP pools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking for best practices way of configuring this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any suggestions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 03:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-2-factor-auth-user-id-mapping/m-p/37266#M27336</guid>
      <dc:creator>CafNetMatt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-17T03:23:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect 2-factor Auth &amp; User-ID Mapping</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-2-factor-auth-user-id-mapping/m-p/37267#M27337</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Figured I'd reply with the answer just in case anyone else has the same question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's a post out there that discusses making sure to fill in the NetBIOS domain name in the 'domain' box in the authentication profile.&amp;nbsp; This applies not just to LDAP but to RADIUS.&amp;nbsp; When you fill this in you will get the DOMAIN\userid in the traffic log and security policies based on a domain security group work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 22:53:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-2-factor-auth-user-id-mapping/m-p/37267#M27337</guid>
      <dc:creator>CafNetMatt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-18T22:53:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

