<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: High Availability VWire in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-vwire/m-p/37562#M27535</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif; color: #1f497d;"&gt;Okay, sounds like A/P will be the answer. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif; color: #1f497d;"&gt;I know how to set up link monitor. For Path monitoring I would have to ping an IP unique to each firewall correct? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nathan.McCart</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-05T00:22:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High Availability VWire</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-vwire/m-p/37560#M27533</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am setting up a HA pair of 5060s in vwire mode between two Cisco ASA's and the internal switch. the ASAs are set up has HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the best way to set up the 5060s in HA to ensure they notice when the ASA fails. I do not want a scenario where the ASA fails but the Palo does not. Then the secondary ASA will be active forwarding traffic to the secondary passive PA that will drop all packets. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is A/A HA the preferred method or using link and path monitoring on the PA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 22:14:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-vwire/m-p/37560#M27533</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nathan.McCart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-04T22:14:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability VWire</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-vwire/m-p/37561#M27534</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you setup the pair as A/A then you really don't need to do anything else.&amp;nbsp; Whatever happens on the ASA a valid path will exist.&amp;nbsp; The disadvantage here is that your HA3 link will need to be sized to accommodate double your max traffic.&amp;nbsp; Sessions will be owned by the primary node and when failover occurs the traffic will start coming in and out the secondary path.&amp;nbsp; But session inspection will happen on the primary so the traffic goes over the the primary inspected and returned to the secondary for egress.&amp;nbsp; You will need to be sure you won't max out the link. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you use A/P then link and path monitoring should be able to detect the lost of your primary path and trigger the failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2015 22:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-vwire/m-p/37561#M27534</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-04T22:22:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability VWire</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-vwire/m-p/37562#M27535</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif; color: #1f497d;"&gt;Okay, sounds like A/P will be the answer. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri',sans-serif; color: #1f497d;"&gt;I know how to set up link monitor. For Path monitoring I would have to ping an IP unique to each firewall correct? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:22:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-vwire/m-p/37562#M27535</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nathan.McCart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-05T00:22:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High Availability VWire</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-vwire/m-p/37563#M27536</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct, you need a unique address for each of the ASA nodes to determine it is not available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 09:42:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-availability-vwire/m-p/37563#M27536</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-05T09:42:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

