<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Upgrade to 6.1.1 and problem with Vulnerability Protection profile in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/upgrade-to-6-1-1-and-problem-with-vulnerability-protection/m-p/37673#M27603</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you roe answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, the configuration was not changed after upgrade, but THAT signature started blocking valuable server, so I decided to change the rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably,&amp;nbsp; "exception" feature has changed the logic in new version?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 14:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Oleksandr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-02T14:38:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Upgrade to 6.1.1 and problem with Vulnerability Protection profile</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/upgrade-to-6-1-1-and-problem-with-vulnerability-protection/m-p/37671#M27601</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had a problem with Vulnerability Protection profile.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created Custom Vulnerability signature with exception for only one (1) IP address. But after upgrading to 6.1.1 version (from 6.0.5) this exception stopped working... I had to copletelywrite a new rule to exempt this IP from scanning...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The signature was based on 40015 (SSH Brute-force).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:31:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/upgrade-to-6-1-1-and-problem-with-vulnerability-protection/m-p/37671#M27601</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oleksandr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-31T17:31:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgrade to 6.1.1 and problem with Vulnerability Protection profile</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/upgrade-to-6-1-1-and-problem-with-vulnerability-protection/m-p/37672#M27602</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was the configuration still present but not working or was the customization of the signature lost in the upgrade?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Either way, you should probably create a support case with this information so a bug can be logged and the upgrade issue corrected in future releases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 13:22:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/upgrade-to-6-1-1-and-problem-with-vulnerability-protection/m-p/37672#M27602</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T13:22:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgrade to 6.1.1 and problem with Vulnerability Protection profile</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/upgrade-to-6-1-1-and-problem-with-vulnerability-protection/m-p/37673#M27603</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you roe answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, the configuration was not changed after upgrade, but THAT signature started blocking valuable server, so I decided to change the rule.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably,&amp;nbsp; "exception" feature has changed the logic in new version?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 14:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/upgrade-to-6-1-1-and-problem-with-vulnerability-protection/m-p/37673#M27603</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oleksandr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-02T14:38:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgrade to 6.1.1 and problem with Vulnerability Protection profile</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/upgrade-to-6-1-1-and-problem-with-vulnerability-protection/m-p/37674#M27604</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have many exceptions setup in our signatures and it is NOT normal for the behavior to change in an upgrade.&amp;nbsp; Based on your description, this is most likely a software bug that should be reported with a ticket to Palo Alto support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 21:27:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/upgrade-to-6-1-1-and-problem-with-vulnerability-protection/m-p/37674#M27604</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-02T21:27:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

