<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Physical connectivity validation on passive device in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/physical-connectivity-validation-on-passive-device/m-p/38217#M27985</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use vsys on our PaloAlto cluster. During a new vsys deployment, I would like to validate that the passive device's physical connectivity to a switch is working. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I don't wish to launch a failover just for this, because it could impact the whole cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to test physical or logical interfaces connectivity without any failover ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Emmanuel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Duplem</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-01T09:50:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Physical connectivity validation on passive device</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/physical-connectivity-validation-on-passive-device/m-p/38217#M27985</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use vsys on our PaloAlto cluster. During a new vsys deployment, I would like to validate that the passive device's physical connectivity to a switch is working. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I don't wish to launch a failover just for this, because it could impact the whole cluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to test physical or logical interfaces connectivity without any failover ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Emmanuel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/physical-connectivity-validation-on-passive-device/m-p/38217#M27985</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duplem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-01T09:50:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Physical connectivity validation on passive device</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/physical-connectivity-validation-on-passive-device/m-p/38218#M27986</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you're running PAN-OS 4.1 or prior, you can set the HA passive link state to auto for L3 deployment,&amp;nbsp; This will allow for the Ethernet links to be up if connected to a switch.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Starting in PAN-OS 5.0, you can set the HA passive link state to auto for L3 and vwire modes. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/physical-connectivity-validation-on-passive-device/m-p/38218#M27986</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmonvon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-01T18:52:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Physical connectivity validation on passive device</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/physical-connectivity-validation-on-passive-device/m-p/38219#M27987</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for these useful information !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Emmanuel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 08:13:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/physical-connectivity-validation-on-passive-device/m-p/38219#M27987</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duplem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-04T08:13:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

