<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PAN VM series throughput in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-vm-series-throughput/m-p/38965#M28570</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the throughput on the PAN VM series an arbitrary cap set by the PAN software? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that it certainly shouldn't be on the hardware side as one could do 10gb netorking, put it on SSD and throw as much ram/cpu at is as they desired. And I would think it's not a software 'limitation' since the PAN 3000s and up go well above 600mbps. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 12:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SDorsey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-15T12:27:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PAN VM series throughput</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-vm-series-throughput/m-p/38965#M28570</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the throughput on the PAN VM series an arbitrary cap set by the PAN software? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that it certainly shouldn't be on the hardware side as one could do 10gb netorking, put it on SSD and throw as much ram/cpu at is as they desired. And I would think it's not a software 'limitation' since the PAN 3000s and up go well above 600mbps. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 12:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-vm-series-throughput/m-p/38965#M28570</guid>
      <dc:creator>SDorsey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-15T12:27:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PAN VM series throughput</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-vm-series-throughput/m-p/38966#M28571</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no hard-set cap on VM-Series performance.&amp;nbsp; Performance is dictated by the resources you allocate to the virtual firewall.&amp;nbsp; The performance numbers on the datasheet were generated using 4 CPU cores, although it is not mentioned which processor family/speed, etc.&amp;nbsp; Your mileage will vary depending on the # of CPU cores and how fast those cores are.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Expect to see a difference in performance between a VM-Series with 8 "general purpose" Intel CPU cores, and a PA-5060 which has dedicated network processors, FPGAs, and 36 security processor cores.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 16:30:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-vm-series-throughput/m-p/38966#M28571</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvalentine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-15T16:30:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PAN VM series throughput</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-vm-series-throughput/m-p/38967#M28572</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also remember that if you are looking for the higher performance make sure your v-switch port inside the hyper-visor supports what you want the VM series to process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:21:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pan-vm-series-throughput/m-p/38967#M28572</guid>
      <dc:creator>pulukas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-16T00:21:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

