<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Make PA speak to AD without a User-ID Agent? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/make-pa-speak-to-ad-without-a-user-id-agent/m-p/40541#M29778</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to use AD-integration in the PA unit (setup security rules based on logged in user or which group the logged in user belongs to) one need today to setup a few additional servers running the User-ID Agent (unless you want this agent to be running straight on your AD-servers).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be nifty is if the PA unit could speak directly to the AD (using its own read-only account) without the need of any additional servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this perhaps already on the roadmap and is this even possible (I mean sure there is a mgmt-plane but I guess there is a reason for why the User-ID Agent of today is an external process instead of internal one)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or can this be done today already with lets say 4.1.1 (or the soon to be released 4.1.2)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:53:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-08T19:53:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Make PA speak to AD without a User-ID Agent?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/make-pa-speak-to-ad-without-a-user-id-agent/m-p/40541#M29778</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In order to use AD-integration in the PA unit (setup security rules based on logged in user or which group the logged in user belongs to) one need today to setup a few additional servers running the User-ID Agent (unless you want this agent to be running straight on your AD-servers).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be nifty is if the PA unit could speak directly to the AD (using its own read-only account) without the need of any additional servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this perhaps already on the roadmap and is this even possible (I mean sure there is a mgmt-plane but I guess there is a reason for why the User-ID Agent of today is an external process instead of internal one)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or can this be done today already with lets say 4.1.1 (or the soon to be released 4.1.2)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:53:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/make-pa-speak-to-ad-without-a-user-id-agent/m-p/40541#M29778</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-08T19:53:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Make PA speak to AD without a User-ID Agent?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/make-pa-speak-to-ad-without-a-user-id-agent/m-p/40542#M29779</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;currently this is not supported. you can create a enhancement request. i have checked internally and there is no roadmap for this at the moment. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 05:15:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/make-pa-speak-to-ad-without-a-user-id-agent/m-p/40542#M29779</guid>
      <dc:creator>jnguyen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-18T05:15:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

